That Word, Terrorism

That word, terrorism. I do not think it means what David Gomez thinks it means.

Doubtless, Mr. Gomez meant that the Islamic shooter who attacked the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle – who does not represent all Muslims any more than Phelps et. al represent Christians – did not act as part of an organized terror plot. It was probably more or less spur of the moment. Something like, “I have a gun, I’m really mad at Israel, nothing good on TV, I guess I’ll go kill some Jooos who are the source of all evil in the world.” Although he was not funded by al Qaeda or Iran – that we know of – that does not make it less an act of terror.

The FBI defines terror in the Code of Federal Regulations as “…the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” I’d like to ask Gomez why this shooting isn’t terror. Perceived payback for what’s “going on in Israel” certainly qualifies as a political or social objective. But the American government has a knee-jerk reaction to not call Islamic terror by its name. It’s so consistent it may well be a written policy somewhere.

Props to CAIR in Seattle, who said

There is no room for such acts of violence in our city and community. When one of us is attacked, none of us are safe. We refuse to see the violence in the Middle East spill over to our cities and neighborhoods.

We reject and categorically condemn any attacks against the Jewish community and stand in solidarity with the Jewish Federation in this tragedy.

but their parent organization, CAIR, was predictable. They at least avoided use of the word “backlash.”

The American Muslim and Jewish communities must do whatever is within their power to prevent the current conflict in the Middle East from being transplanted to this country. We also urge local, state and national law enforcement authorities to step up security measures at synagogues, mosques and other religious institutions of both faiths.

Because it’s well known that Jews have committed acts of terror in American airports and college campuses, with sniper fire in Washington, D.C., and encouraged more of the same. Preaching that advocates terror is a serious problem in many foreign-funded synagogues in this country. That’s why the Jewish communities need to step up and take responsibility for driving this kind of hatred out of their communities.

If Mr. Gomez can’t bring himself to call it terror, he could at least call it a hate crime. If we must have hate crime laws, they could at least be used on occasions such as this. Theo van Gogh, who was also not a victim of radical Islamic terror by Mr. Gomez’ understanding of the word, is still unavailable for comment.

[Added - Again, I don't think the shooter, Naveed Afzal Haq, represents all Muslims. But I think he represents a lot more of them than we'd like to admit. Approximately 13% of Muslims (208,000) just in the UK thought the 7/7 bombers were martyrs. If only 5% of those Muslims were willing to act on that belief (that the bombers were martyrs and consequently the bombings were admirable and justified) that is 10,400 people. Just in the UK. I haven't seen surveys like this in America, but I'd be willing to bet a lot of people in Dearborn, MI, for example, nodded approvingly when they heard about this shooter.

Jay Tea also noted CAIR's reaction.]

Life Post-Katrina

I was checking the weather and noted this:

at200699_model.gif

Life after Katrina is different in so many ways. This isn’t even a storm, it’s a tropical wave, and yet I’m already watching it and planning certain things around it. When I go grocery shopping, for example, I’ll refrain from buying a lot of meat for the freezer, and get more canned goods. It’s better to go to the store three or four times a week than have another freezer full of maggoty, smelly meat. So we plan ahead to have less in the freezer and more in the bank account in the event of an evacuation.

Although we have been in the 2006 hurricane season for a while, things never really seem to get busy until August. As it stands locally, nobody seems to know what’s going on, the Corps of Engineers can’t be trusted here or anywhere else, and Blanco and Chertoff are playing hot potato.

I’m not ready to give up on my home town yet, but I can understand and empathize with those who have. At times, it feels quite hopeless.

Getting Back To Normal

Well, as normal as I ever was, which is subject to debate. :-) The Man of the House’s illness – whatever it is, and the doc has him on some meds so we’ll see – pretty much took over what little processing power my brain had available. It’s going to be at least several more weeks until we know anything – everything so far is negative, and I must admit it’s nice to know that things have been ruled out. Unlike two of our cousins in the last two weeks, The Man has NOT been diagnosed with leukemia, for example. Good news. He doesn’t have a lot of things, including extremely high cholestorol, which was very surprising. Hopefully we’ll find out soon what he does have, or best case scenario, just gets better. (Please, God!)

I’m gradually catching up with the work that didn’t get done in my mania, and posting here will increase if anyone cares. Thanks to those of you who have been praying, I really do appreciate it.

Quick to Judge

The hot topic here in N’awlins are the patient deaths/mercy killings/euthanasia/murders that occurred at Lifecare, a company that rented the 7th floor of Memorial Medical Center. I was in meeting yesterday. The deaths were briefly referred to when someone reported that Ochsner hospital had purchased MMC, and someone immediately said, “She’s innocent.” “She” is Dr. Anna Pou. The nurses involved are seldom mentioned. Based on the accounts so far – and Angela McManus’ account has gone unrebutted – it seems clear that patients were purposely killed. But it appears that the main witnesses against Dr. Pou are Lifecare administrators.

Based on [Louisiana Attorney General Charles] Foti’s affidavit, much of the case against Pou and the two nurses is built on statements provided by four LifeCare administrators. Three of the administrators said Pou told them she was going to inject a “lethal dose” of medicine into several patients who appeared on the brink of death and “were not aware of what was happening.”

But according to the affidavit, one of the administrators challenged Pou’s conclusions, telling her that at least one of the patients, 61-year-old Emmett Everett Sr., was “aware, conscious and alert.” The administrator said Pou asked a LifeCare nurse who knew Everett to handle his injection, but the nurse refused.

LifeCare administrators said they watched as Pou, Budo and Landry filled several syringes with an unknown substance in a therapy room and then walked door to door, administering the apparently fatal shots.

No misconduct reports

According to the affidavit, “Dr. Pou appeared to be nervous” as she approached Everett’s room, telling a LifeCare administrator that she was going to tell the patient that “she was going to give him something to help with his dizziness.” Budo or Landry volunteered to help with the injection, the administrator told investigators, but Pou decided to do it by herself.

Budo and Landry, however, assisted in the other injections, according to the LifeCare administrators. One of them told investigators that she saw Budo give a shot to one of the four alleged overdose victims. The administrator said the patient complained afterward, saying: “That burns.”

After all of the shots were administered, Pou allegedly told the LifeCare administrators to clear the floor of their remaining staff workers and cover any dead patients with a sheet. Pou’s parting words, according to one LifeCare administrator, were: “I want y’all to know I take full responsibility and y’all did a great job taking care of the patients.”

That’s damning, however, what do the Lifecare administrators have to gain by Pou being charged criminally for these deaths? At minimum, it would be convenient to blame deaths at their facility on a rogue doctor. Will it give them enough coverage to escape being sued, or to win when sued?

I’ve been inclined to think Dr. Pou is guilty, but it’s important to remember that the facts are not all in. Ten years ago today a chain of events began which profoundly impacted Richard Jewell’s life. He was vilified, mocked, and speculated about by people all over the world, although he was never arrested or charged for the 1996 Olympic bombing and Eric Rudolph eventually pled guilty to the crime. It’s something to keep in mind when we leap to judgement based on reports in the media.

Related posts here.