How is Blogging Not Public?

Jawdropper of the week – Jennifer Cutler, of Washingtonienne fame, blogged about her sex life with plenty of details about her sex partners and their activities together. When one of her sex partners objected – with a lawsuit – Cutler’s attorney had the gall to argue that Cutler never intended to make the blog public.

Good grief. How is posting something on the internet not public? I suppose if you put it behind a password, you’d have some excuse for thinking it might remain private. You’d be an idiot, but an idiot with an excuse. She doesn’t even have that.

If the case goes to trial, its outcome will be important both to bloggers and to people who chronicle their lives on social-networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook. Marc Rotenberg, director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said he may teach the Washingtonienne case this spring during his class at Georgetown Law School.

“Anybody who wants to reveal their own private life has a right to do that. It’s a different question when you reveal someone else’s private life,” he said, adding that simply calling something a diary doesn’t make it one. “It’s not sitting in a nice, leather-bound book under a pillow. It’s online where a million people can find it.”

Dhimmi Carter and His Murdering Pals

carter_arafat.jpg Captain’s Quarters has the story – what we all “knew” about Arafat is unequivocally true – and the State Department has had the facts for decades. There is no murdering terrorist, evidently, with whom they will not negotiate.

The State Department had proof all along that Yasser Arafat not only masterminded this attack, but deliberately plotted to kill American diplomats as a means to pressure the US out of the Middle East. In other words, the PLO/Fatah/BSO conducted a terrorist attack on American interests, murdered Americans, and got away with it. They sat on this information while the US insisted on negotiating with Arafat, even though many suspected he had planned the murders all along.

The State Department should have warned successive administrations from dealing with this terrorist and instead recommended that we capture him and try him for the murders of Noel and Moore. These men worked for the State Department themselves. I guess the lesson here is that State won’t lift a finger to bring assassins of diplomats to justice, a lesson that current diplomats may want to consider now. (via It Shines For All)

The State Department’s deliberate policies of appeasement, when there was no doubt whatsoever about the kind of person they were dealing with, are a great example of why the world no longer respects the United States. I don’t particularly care if we are liked, which is fortunate because we never will be unless it is the kind of “liking” we benefited from after 9/11. When we were wounded and bleeding, every country had “goodwill” toward us which was “squandered” the minute the bleeding stopped and we were no longer perceived as vulnerable. We don’t need to be liked, especially when the criteria for being liked is being weak.

We need to be respected, and under the current mindset at the State Department, that will never be permitted to happen. We need John Bolton to go over there and clean house, but that will never, unfortunately, happen. So all we can do, until we lose a city and quite possibly even after that, is look forward to State Department weenies insisting that giving thugs and terrorists all the time extensions they need to build weapons to use against us is the right thing – indeed the only moral thing – to do.

Map of Religion

I thought this was interesting. We often feel like the way things are, are they way they’ve always been, but that’s not true at all. There have been great movements and changes in religion over the centuries, and we are in the midst of a great movement right now. We are such short term thinkers these days (why does this blasted microwave take so long!) that’s it’s quite difficult to realize that we have an enemy who has been waging war against us since 1979, and that there is a long term and purposeful plan to apply sharia globally. It’s hard to understand that there are going to repercussions – profound repercussions – for surrendering in Iraq. In any event, this map illustrates some great waves of history so that even we short term thinkers should be able to “get it” and perhaps realize that history is still be written.

Time Magazine Gets At Least One Thing Right

Time gets one thing right, and I was very encouraged to read it:

But what is certain is that the strife-torn Horn is more divided today than ever — and is increasingly the arena for an international war between the forces of radical Islam, and the West and its allies. [emphasis added]

One of the main things I have been so frustrated with about the MSM coverage of the war is the nearly universal failure to see things strategically. No one seems to understand the value of our holding Iraq, for example, in light of the fact that it’s neighbor has been waging war on us for thirty years. All the coverage seems to be “get Bush” or if not “get Bush” at least grinding somebody’s political axe. But Islamist attacks have been occurring all over the world, and for reasons unrelated to either Israel or Iraq. It’s a refreshing change to have a major MSM player acknowledge for once that this is an international war (they don’t dare call it a “world war” yet) and that the opponents are the forces of radical Islam against the West. I hope this is a sign that the propaganda war might be turning, just a bit, in favor of reality.