National Propaganda Radio

Evidently NPR is now part of the Reichwing Media – a couple of comments at Dkos are real jaw-droppers:

NPR (4+ / 0-)

just gets worse every day.

“If impeachment is off the table, so is democracy.” -teacherken

by offgrid on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 06:42:23 PM PDT

and a bit further downthread -

What do you expect…. (1+ / 0-)

NPR just gets worse every day.

from National Propaganda Radio?

Let’s Grow Our Own Candidates!

by moosely2006 on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 07:54:42 PM PDT

Honestly, how can we even engage people in debate who think that NPR is rightwing propaganda? (And no, the comments don’t specify that they think it’s rightwing – I’m inferring that. But I’m correct.)

And yet, even further downthread, these two comments illustrate the problem more clearly than anything else I could ever write:

Ever feel like you’re talking to a brick wall? nt (3+ / 0-)

08.04.07 It took the Titanic longer to sink than for the 110th Congress to surrender to Bush.

by ImpeachKingBushII on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 06:39:16 PM PDT

 

No. (1+ / 0-)

I feel like I am talking to a wall of titanium sixty feet thick and a hundred feet high with a big picture on it of a face with it’s eyes closed tight and it’s hands covering it’s ears going “Na na na na na na…”

It’s like going through a sewer in a glass bottom boat. We’re in this sh*t but clearly above it!

by Kalakzak on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 06:42:19 PM PDT

Finally, an area where I can agree with some folks on the left. I don’t think there’s much hope for this generation; how can we ever communicate? We each have our own facts, and they are so diametrically opposed that I just don’t see any way we can come together again. Back when we all had the same facts, but different opinions about the facts, we managed. But no longer. We simply talk louder – and more shrilly – pretending that volume can substitute for reason. I certainly hope the next generation does better than we have.

 

 

[* - edited for profanity, edited formatting after publishing for clarity; the blockquotes were all messed up.]

But you look so good!

There’s an article on Diversity, Inc: ‘But You Look So Good!’ and 7 Other Things NOT to Say to a Person With a Non-Visible Disability

If you have a friend, relative or coworker with an illness or disability that isn’t obvious, you may think you’re doing the right thing by saying he or she “looks so good.” You can’t even tell the person has a disability, and that’s a good thing, right? Wrong.

 

Why do people with disabilities take offense to this comment and others like it? Ninety-six percent of illnesses are invisible to the average person, according to InvisibleIllness.com. To comment on a person’s outward appearance dictates, intentionally or otherwise, that they should feel the way they look: just fine.

 

However, non-visible or chronic illnesses, such as diabetes, mental illness, lupus, multiple sclerosis and fibromyalgia, can be debilitating.

Oh, I don’t know.  I have fibromyalgia and other health problems, few people know it, and that’s just how I like it.  And anytime someone tells me I look good, baby, I’m taking that and running with it.  Seriously.  I’m going to be 39 tomorrow.  Life is too short to dissect or question a compliment.  Just enjoy them.

I absolutely know that fibromyalgia and other chronic illnesses are a serious problem, and there are emotional components to those illnesses as well.  I just can’t find much to be offended about in the comment, although I also know that when I’m having a particularly bad time and am in a lot of pain, I tend to be, errr… grumpy.  Still, that gripe aside, it’s an interesting article, especially where it conflates chronic illnesses with disabilities.

Coping with a chronic illness at work is often a struggle.  While I do not want to inflict my clients with stories of my health woes, it has occasionally affected deadlines, and when it happens I need to give some explanation for that.  I’m often self-conscious about it – my hair was falling out and getting quite thin last year, for example.  Should I explain, ignore, get a wig?  Luckily it stopped before I had to decide.  My husband was diagnosed with diabetes last year, and now he needs to plan things like when to test and to eat.  It affects his day to day routines.  So even these relatively minor things are troublesome and life-affecting.  People have to cope the best way they can.    Here’s what really interested me about the article:

This year, Sept. 10-16 is National Invisible Chronic Illness Awareness Week. Since 2002, the week has been recognized nationally each year to unite and mobilize people with non-visible disabilities and illnesses and their allies to educate government, healthcare companies, and the general public about the 133 million people living with a chronic condition. That number is expected to increase by more than one percent a year to 150 million by 2030, according to a study for The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and 42 million of those will be limited in their ability to go to school, to work, or to live independently. Read the full study.

If less than one-third of the people living with a chronic condition are limited in their ability to go to school, to work, or live independently (criteria most people would agree is important to defining someone as “disabled”) why are the two lumped together?  Is the goal simply to have a larger grievance group?  And this was breathtaking:

This Means You

 

If you think this won’t be a concern until old age, take note: 75 percent of people with chronic conditions are younger than 65.

 

One of the biggest obstacles in the disability community is the attitude of the temporarily able-bodied.

The temporarily able-bodied.  Good grief.  Age happens.  Life happens.  Anyone can be injured or diagnosed with an illness at any time.  But are we all destined to be classified as disabled in the end?  Why not just classify us all as dying?  After all, each day we live we are one day closer to death.  No, thanks.  If that attitude makes me an obstacle to the disability community, too bad.

The Jena 6: Newsweek Article

Go check it out -A Town In Turmoil.

The Jena 6: Offer to Jena Defenders

I’d like to make an offer to Jena defenders.  There have been some very rational comments from several Jena defenders, notably the person posting as “From Jena” and from James Black.  I can understand the desire to defend your town, the same way I defend New Orleans when outsiders go on and on about Nagin being re-elected.  Things aren’t always what they seem.  And as a general rule, I have a healthy distrust of the media; I’m perfectly willing to accept the concept that they have twisted the reporting on this situation and left out pertinent info.  They do it ALL THE TIME on other matters, why not this one?  I have strong feelings about this case, based on the facts I know so far.  Most people do.  It seems pretty obvious that Reed Walters enthusiastically prosecuted black kids while basically giving whites a free pass.  I’ve formed that opinion based on the facts that are in evidence already, widely reported and undisputed so far, and given what I have personally seen and the accounts of people I know and trust about what life is like for black folks in Louisiana.  But I’m more than willing to hear from the other side on this, especially those who claim this is twisted beyond all recognition.

I’m not willing to just take the word of a total stranger on a blog, however.  As bad as the media is, there is at least some level of accountability for what they write, particularly with the blogosphere riding herd on them and fact checking them daily.  So, Jena defenders, now is your chance to fact check the media on this issue.  As you can see from this chart of my August visitor stats, PH typically gets 20-30,000 visitors a month.  However, a recent spike in traffic due to the interest in the Jena 6 gives you access to a wider audience, specifically those seeking info about this story.  So I’m making two offers:

1) You can guest post your version of the story.  You can do so anonymously, but you will have to prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that you really are in Jena.  Email me at laura@pursuingholiness.com for details on how that can be done.  I will not change a single word of what you write, although I will almost certainly respond to it in a different post.  And I won’t necessarily fisk it – if you present a good case, you just might find me and many others in agreement.  I will not post any kind of racist screed, i.e. “those n****** had it coming for being so uppity,” type of thing, but a reasonable defense with some facts I can verify will be published verbatim, and anonymously if requested.

2) You can allow me to interview you for an article I will cross post to BNN.  That article will be included in the Google news feed and hundreds of thousands of people will have access to it.

You want to defend Jena?  It’s unlikely you’ll have a better chance, if what you say about the media twisting the story is true.  Think about it, and if you’re ready to step up, shoot me an email.

trafficspike.JPG