The Jena 6 Media Circus and Alan Bean

It seemed from the news coverage that the whole world converged on Jena today. But this blog post really caught my attention. Alan Bean was, as far as I know, the first guy on this story. CNN gave him a photo credit for his photo of the “white tree” – and then promptly cut to Al Sharpton. Bean wrote -

When I showed up at Antioch Baptist church, I remembered the first organizing meeting when I was the only person from outside Jena in the room. This time, the church had been comandeered by VH1 and I was told I could not enter. Instead, Salt and Peppa (remember them) were inside interviewing the Jena 6 parents while fully uniformed members of the New Black Panther Party patrolled outside. It was a cartoon–something I didn’t particularly want to be associated with. I have no beef with these people–but why are they suddenly in charge? And why have the folks who stood by the families when no one else would listen been so rudely thrust aside. I know I’m not supposed to focus on these questions–but I have watched this movie before–in Tulia, Texas.

Whether or not you agree with Bean – and I don’t agree with him on every issue, not by a long shot – that’s just sad. I believe he is an honest and honorable man, devoting his life to what he sincerely thinks is right. And to be callously shut out of something that he has put so much time and energy into, and worked so hard to keep going, is wrong.

Jena 6: Another Day, Another Outage – Liveblogging CNN Coverage

Traffic is just too high for comments – in spite of the RAM upgrade it’s taking out client sites. The protest is today and CNN is giving it a lot of airtime – I think the traffic will slow down enough tomorrow to bring them back on. However, I’d like to take the opportunity to clarify a few things:

  • If the Jena 6 are found guilty in a fair trial for beating Justin Barker, then they need to be punished. That’s for you commenters who say all charges should be dropped and they should be set free.
  • They should be punished appropriately. Not for crimes they may commit in the future – that’s for you commenters who say they need to be “taken off the street before they do worse” and for you “hang those savages” commenters.
  • Not everyone in Jena is a racist. Some of the protesters are racist.
  • There are legitimate reasons to question whether D.A. Reed Walters engaged in selective prosecution, and whether Mychal Bell’s trial was fair.
  • There are legitimate reasons to question whether the original charges were fair and appropriate.
  • Justin Barker did not hang the nooses. His friends did. Even if he HAD hung the nooses, that’s not an excuse to beat him several months later. Justin Barker may or may not have called Robert Bailey a nigger and laughed at him for having his ass whipped. Even if he did, that’s not an excuse to beat him.
  • The noose-hangers, Justin Barker, and the Jena 6 were all minors. Teenagers. A group not known for good judgment and common sense. The root of the problem in this situation is the adults.
  • The American flag that CNN is showing that the Jena 6 protesters put where the “white tree” was is UPSIDE DOWN. That’s no coincidence. You just lost a LOT of sympathy from me, just like the illegal alien protesters did for the same disrespect to the flag.

When comments come back on, they will be registration only, in the hope that the worst of the racists, on both sides, won’t bother. Comments will still be moderated, as well. This march is certainly a crescendo, but it’s not the end of the situation, and a lot of things still have to happen before it is fully resolved. New information will come out, some of it on this blog. It is my hope that we can have a civil, and useful discussion about it.

There are literally dozens of Jena 6 posts in the archive that include every detail I could find about the case going back to the beginning. Here are a few with lots of links and info:

The Jena 6: Nooses Hang From The “White Tree” – a good place to start with a summary of the entire case.
The Jena 6: Since When Do Teenage Boys Watch Lonesome Dove? – the first Jena 6 post on this blog
Jena Six: Justin Barker Testifies at Mychal Bell Trial
Jena 6: More Testimony, Going To The Jury UPDATED – More on the testimony in the case including Justin Barkers injuries, which were NOT severe.
Jena 6: A Primer To The Racial Unrest In Jena, Louisiana – A who’s who in the Jena Six case. This has been copied and posted in many places.
Jena 6: Sentencing and Hope for Mychal Bell – The Louisiana Supreme Court overturned a conviction very similar to Mychal Bell’s.
Jena 6: Update and Background Info – How’d they get an all white jury? Was it deliberate?
Jena 6: Cross Burnings = Noose Hangings? – Prometheus 6 noted that cross burnings are illegal. Wouldn’t that also cover nooses?
Jena 6: Sentencing Delayed, DOJ Conducts Forum – the DOJ finally made it to Jena, but it was the PR division, not the civil rights division.
The Jena 6: Update on Mychal Bell – his status as of 8/19/07
____________________

I’ve got CNN on and I’ll be blogging on some of their coverage.

2:08 – Mos Def interview. Citizen of the world? This is a national security issue? What has this guy been smoking? Oh please… maybe that explains the sunglasses. He’s mentioning the stories of the Confederate flags – it should be noted that a commenter yesterday said CNN showed yesterday that is flying in a town near Jena – not in Jena. It should also be noted that on several white supremacist message boards (I have google alerts on all topics Jena) they intended to be in Jena today as well. So all Confederate flag flying can’t be attributed to Jena residents – outsiders have come to stir up trouble. He says “the responsible thing to do” is to free the Jena 6. I object to the concept that because Justin Barker is fine today, there should be no penalty whatsoever for the attack. I believe his injuries were minor, I’ve contended that all along. But the attitude of the law CAN’T be “no harm, no foul.”

3:24 – The 3rd District Court of Appeals says that Mychal Bell needs to be brought to the LaSalle Parish courthouse for a hearing within the next 72 hours. The explanation, however, for why he is still being held is that bail was denied and the case is still under appeal, as far as the latest I’ve read. Duh. CNN should KNOW this.

7:57 – Donald Washington just said that Mychal Bell had 4 battery convictions.  WRONG AGAIN, Donald!  Good grief, is there anything this guy can get right?  Bell’s had two battery convictions.  And two convictions on criminal damage to property.  Not four battery convictions.  This guy is driving me up a wall.  He sounds reasonable, and I want to agree with him, then he either lies or makes a mistake – but the mistake is always in the favor of the prosecution.  Well, he’s entitled to his opinion but not his own facts.  No, two fewer battery convictions don’t make Bell an altar boy.  But as I’ve said repeatedly throughout all of this, the truth is bad enough – don’t dramatize it.  Or lie about it.

Comments Turned Off Due To Server Load UPDATED

Sorry, guys… Because of a traffic surge, comments needed to be turned off for a while. It was affecting my clients on this server. Hopefully I’ll be able to get them back on soon – we need more RAM.

If you’re inclined, hit the tip jar to speed the process up:


Thanks!

[Added - I turned off most of the sidebars as well.]

Update: If you experienced the outage last night or this morning you can understand my frustration.  Everyone who can’t get to Jena wants to comment, as well as several people claiming to be from Jena.  Not just this site, but every database driven site on the server was down.  This is driving me up a wall because there are a lot of good comments – and some infuriating ones.  One commenter took note of the fact that the Confederate flag shown on CNN was actually in a different town entirely.  And Al Sharpton criticizing Barack Obama for “acting white” – good Lord….

Thanks for hitting the tip jar, it’s much appreciated.  I’m working on getting the RAM added, should be soon.

If WaPo Wants To Fact Check Pols, They Should Start With Murtha

Hot Air currently has this pithy headline: WaPo takes a dump on Fred’s pride in American sacrifice. Evidently Fred Thompson said in a stump speech,

“You know, you look back over our history, and it doesn’t take you long to realize that our people have shed more blood for other people’s liberty than any other combination of nations in the history of the world.”

WaPo found it impossible to let that statement stand, and spent about 600 words debunking it, concluding,

Thompson’s jingoistic assertion cannot be supported by facts, barring some tortuous definition of the phrase “other people’s liberty.” We asked his presidential campaign for factual support for the claim, but it did not respond. We therefore award Thompson four Pinocchios.

Oooh, snap!  They got him! Way to practice that old-school investigative journalism! The fact is, Thompson’s rhetoric was over the top and inaccurate. Fine. Call him on it. Sam Brownback and Mike Gravel have also received them, and this will be an interesting measure by which to judge WaPo’s political coverage – who gets Pinocchios, for which rhetorical offenses, and how many they receive.

But if they’re serious about fact-checking politicians, they need to get going on Senator John Murtha, who accused our troops of murdering Iraqis “in cold blood.” Murtha employed the leftist “military as psychopathic victims” meme, nearly as popular as the “military as children” meme with the “military as victimized poor children” variation. The problem is, there is increasing reason to believe he was wrong, and in any event, should have kept his mouth shut at least until the investigation was complete. Now that some Marines have been exonerated, he suddenly believes it’s better to wait and comment after the trial when presumably all the facts are in evidence:

JEFF GANNON: In May 2006, you said that Marines killed innocent Iraqis citizens in cold blood at Hatitha. A year later, some of them have been exonerated. At some point are you going to apologize to these men?

REP. MURTHA: The trial’s not over yet.

JEFF GANNON: You’ve spoken out before. You went on national television and called these men “cold blooded killers.”

REP. MURTHA: The trial’s not over yet.

Isn’t about time to hold Murtha as accountable for slander as Thompson, Brownback and Gravel have been for campaign rhetoric?  How about it, WaPo?