Banning the "N-word," Global Warming and Gay Marriage

Some people are more equal than others when it comes to insulting words. If you have enough melanin, you can use the dreaded “N-word” with impunity, along with the correct word for a female canine, and that long-handled garden tool – minus the “e” at the end.

Snoop says,

“It’s a completely different scenario,” said Snoop, barking over the phone from a hotel room in L.A. “[Rappers] are not talking about no collegiate basketball girls who have made it to the next level in education and sports. We’re talking about ho’s that’s in the ‘hood that ain’t doing sh–, that’s trying to get a n—a for his money. These are two separate things. First of all, we ain’t no old-a** white men that sit up on MSNBC [which announced Wednesday it would drop its simulcast of Imus’ radio show] going hard on black girls. We are rappers that have these songs coming from our minds and our souls that are relevant to what we feel. I will not let them mutha—-as say we in the same league as him.”

Nearly twenty years ago, a member of my family explained to me at length why there was nothing wrong with her using the “N-word” because she was referencing low-class, criminal, drug-dealing, no child support paying, young black men – not all black people. Never that! Besides, they use it All. The. Time. so it must be okay. And yet, at the end of the day, I had to explain that she was either going to give up the use of that word in my presence, or not spend time with me or my daughter. I didn’t want my daughter, who was very young at the time, raised in an environment where that word was considered acceptable. I find it interesting that Snoop used the exact same argument as my relative. Snoop can do what he wants, but I think that the hypocrisy is worth noting, as well as the fact that it perpetuates socially acceptable racist terms.

Likewise for the “B” word (profanity asterisked out):

In a videotaped deposition played for the jury at fired Knicks exec Anucha Browne Sanders’ sexual harassment trial, Thomas said he drew a distinction between whites and blacks when it came to the B-word.

Asked if he was bothered by a black man calling a black female “b****,” Thomas said: “Not as much. I’m sorry to say, I do make a distinction.

“A white male calling a black female a b**** is highly offensive,” Thomas said. “That would have violated my code of conduct.”

“Maybe I shouldn’t go there. … A white male calling a black female, that is wrong with me. I’m not taking that. I’m not accepting that. … That’s a problem for me.”

It seems that Mr. Thomas’ code of conduct is intended to control other people’s behavior – specifically white men’s behavior – instead of his own. He’s “sorry to say” it – but why?  Perhaps at some level he understands how hypocritical he is.  He wants to defend black women from some people, but reserve the right to denigrate and insult them himself.  But if the word is wrong, it’s wrong for everybody, all the time.

A large part of the successful push for gay marriage is that people feel the institution of marriage is not worth defending. You don’t work to defend something that is meaningless to you. Both divorce and cohabitation are up, and long term marriage – reaching the silver or gold anniversary – is down. If conservatives – especially Christians, whose divorce rate tracks with the rest of the country – really believed in marriage, we would get married and stay married. But we don’t. And since few people feel particularly moved to spend time and energy defending traditional marriage, the issue of gay marriage is on the table and may become legal all over the country. Traditional marriage – lifetime commitments, for better or worse, until death do we part marriage – has largely been abandoned. Now it’s emotion-based. “I don’t love her anymore,” and “He isn’t fulfilling my needs.” But if emotion is the criteria to get and stay married, then we are hypocritical to complain when others pick up that argument and use it as well. Like it or not, marriage is fair game. We abandoned it and they’re picking it up.

Al Gore is a superstar to the global warming crowd. He’s put a lot of miles on his private jet, traveling around and preaching the Doctrine of Gaea. But as Glenn Reynolds succinctly noted, “I’ll believe it’s a crisis when the people who say it’s a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis.”

If minorities really do wish for certain words to become socially unacceptable, they’re going to have to give them up first. Show that you mean it – stop using words you identify as offensive. Teach your children and influence your communities to stop using the words you claim are so hateful. When white people really believe that you believe those words are wrong, we’ll follow your lead. People have a right to say what they want, and these things must not be legislated. But we can and should self-limit what is considered acceptable in polite society.

It may have started already: Comedian gets the hook for using N-word. I certainly hope so.

Teen Sentenced To Five Years For Baseball Bat Beating

Teen Sentenced To Five Years For Baseball Bat Beating

BATES COUNTY — A Bates County teenager will spend five years in prison for attacking another teen with a baseball bat.

No one knows why Bryan Murphy, 18, attacked Isaiah Stapleton last year, hitting him several times with a baseball bat. Murphy pleaded guilty to assault and armed criminal action.

The judge told Murphy that it’s only by the grace of god that this wasn’t a murder trial and sentenced him to five years in prison with no chance of parole.

“I feel five years is something to get the message across that what he did is not okay because I feel he tried to murder my son,” David Stapleton said.

A big hat tip to Ken for the story.

As Roach correctly pointed out in another comment thread, the plural of anecdote is not data. Still, I find it interesting how this crime is being treated compared to Justin Barker’s beating. As far as I know, there have been no studies comparing charges and sentences of white criminals vs. black criminals.

Check out the website for Isaiah, the victim of the attack.

Jury Still Out on K-Ville

Last week I had the opportunity to spend the day on the set of K-ville, the new Fox series filmed here in New Orleans when they filmed a flashback scene for episode 6 in St. Alphonsus Church. The show premiered this evening, and I was looking forward to it, but wary of the usual issues – the tendency to make everyone in the city look racist or corrupt, and the way someone can get from the river to the lake in two seconds worth of car chase. My concerns centered on the opportunity to politicize Katrina, which few people miss. I enjoyed the show until the last 5 minutes thoroughly ticked me off. They used the Orleans Parish Prison during and after Katrina as a plot device, and made it look like prisoners drowned and escaped. Which was an out and out lie, and irresponsible to boot; you’d think Shep Smith of Fox News collaborated on that part of the script.

If you want the truth about the OPP during and after Katrina, read No Ordinary Heroes. It contains key inconvenient facts, like, although the prison flooded, it was only a few feet and all prisoners had to do to get out of it was to get in the top bunks. Was it scary? Doubtless, but the water soon stopped rising and no one’s life was in danger. Not one prisoner died, and not one prisoner escaped. They should have come up with a better way to give that character a criminal past and a deep, dark secret.

The show also portrayed New Orleans as very post-apocolyptic, and the truth is while some neighborhoods are untouched since Katrina – and the sewage system couldn’t support them anyway, water pressure is so low, so often – a lot of progress has been made in other areas and the city is functioning well, all things considered. It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that it’s going to take many years to undo the damage the Corps did, and the infrastructure that was neglected before Katrina.

The main characters were good – Marlin Boulet, as portrayed by Anthony Anderson, reminded of several cops I’ve known over the years. And race was portrayed fairly well also – at one point Boulet goes into a voodoo shop owned by a white acquaintance of his and comments, “You’re selling voodoo now? You know you’re white, right?” That was so New Orleans, and not unlike the conversation I had with the person who got me onto the set. Yes, there’s racism here like there is everywhere else, but we also let our hair down with people we know, and in general are not hypersensitive about race like some northern cities I’ve lived in and visited.

Another nit to pick – we don’t speak with deep south accents, and nobody makes shrimp po-boys at home. Still, I’m intrigued enough by Boulet and his new partner Cobb to watch it again next week.  This may turn out to be the show I love to hate.

The Holy Observer is BACK!

If you’re a Christian who likes The Onion, you’ll love The Holy Observer. Current headlines:

The site doesn’t skewer the Christian faith. Here’s what the writers have to say about it -

The Truth

We at The Holy Observer want to let you in on a little secret: we are all really serious about Christianity. We cling to our faith in the one triune God and affirm the classic Christian consensus—those essentials of the faith that have been believed by all Christians, everywhere, and stated best in documents such as the Apostles’ Creed.

That said, we are acutely aware of two facts that drive the content on this site:

1. Laughter is good for the soul.
2. Satire is an appropriate way—and maybe one of the better ways—to comment on the state of Christianity as it is believed and practiced today.

Christians, at times, take themselves too seriously! We can poke fun at the idiosyncrasies that we all have without crossing the line into sacrilege. Just because Christ and the Holy Bible are sacred, doesn’t mean that everything that humans do in the name of Christianity is sacred. Every other belief or ideal that we hold apart from our religion has always been open game. We poke fun at politics, our jobs, and even our families. It’s healthy. It helps us point out the inconsistencies and ridiculousness in our lives in a lighthearted and constructive way. The same should be true for our religious practices. We are human, and our practice of religion is imperfect, just as we all are imperfect. Pointing that out in a good-natured, lighthearted way is not sacrilegious. In fact, it’s constructive. So read our articles looking for the message behind the jab, and have a good laugh. We hope that it helps you take yourself a little less seriously.

One common misconception about this type of humor is that it fosters disunity and animosity among Christians of different traditions and worship styles. Ironically, much of our content that is accused of this is actually designed in a way that we believe brings to light some of the ridiculous presumptions and stereotypes that are the premises of the text. That is, the attacker many times ends up looking more ignorant than the attacked—which is probably the case with many of the issues that cause real division within the church. We fully support the prayer of Christ where he calls all believers to be one “so that the world may believe” (John 17).

On the other hand, we also believe it is reasonable to question and criticize certain behaviors, beliefs, and practices of supposed Christians. God surely gives each of us grace to cover our theological shortcomings, but part of our conversation with God and others must include a humble analysis of differing belief systems.

Ultimately, the actions of any individual can be unhealthy if the motivation is not based on godly ideals. Our intention (besides our intention to make you laugh) is not to harm, but to provoke thought and to keep the human aspects of our relationship with God in proper perspective. We cannot emphasize enough the gravity and seriousness of dealing rightly with the eternal verities of life.

We love Jesus; we love our religion; and we love the church, despite of all its gaffes and blunders (after all, we are all only human!). Thanks for laughing along with us, and hopefully we will all “go on from grace to grace” (to quote John Wesley) and make this world a better place while we’re all here together.

Sincerely,

THO Staff

Non-Christians won’t enjoy this site because they won’t understand quite of lot of it. But if you’re a Christian with a slightly warped and irreverent sense of humor, you’ll bookmark it and visit often.