Books? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Books

Here’s a great piece by Trudy Walsh at Government Computer News on technology and the death of books. This pretty well mirrors what I’ve been thinking for awhile – that technology is taking away something important. When was the last time you saw a couple of teens or young adults carrying on a meaningful conversation? More than likely, one or both of them are too busy texting to talk. I’m as guilty on occasion – it’s easy to sit down to blog and fritter away a couple of hours that could have been spent with family.

Is Kindle for BlackBerry a sign that we’re forgetting how to appreciate a book?

Amazon has released the beta version of Kindle for BlackBerry. Now you can read Amazon e-books on your PC, iPhone, BlackBerry and of course, Kindle, if you have one. This gives BlackBerry device users access to Amazon’s full e-book catalog of 420,000 titles, including 102 of 112 New York Times bestsellers.

“Kindle for BlackBerry is a great way for customers to continue reading their current book wherever they are—in between meetings, at the grocery store or waiting in the doctor’s office,” said Ian Freed, vice president of Amazon Kindle.

This makes me wonder if we are taking this need always to be tethered to a smart phone too far. No need to go to a library to read, no need to close the study door to read, no need to slow down for an hour and open a book to read.

It used to be people had something called an “interior life,” where they could think what are called “thoughts.” Most people had “imaginations,” which is where you could watch little movies in your head, without even opening your eyes. It was better than YouTube, sometimes even better than a real movie. Reading could definitely facilitate your imagination, but when you were away from a book, for whatever reason, you could employ this ancient technology, the imagination. So while waiting in the grocery store line, you could think about what had happened that day or something that you were looking forward to, or worry or make plans or calculate strategies. All of this without booting up a device. Shocking but true.

Even more shocking, people used to talk to each other in the grocery store line. Sometimes they would strike up a conversation about the Bat Boy featured on the cover of the Weekly World News tabloid. Sometimes people tried to butt in line in front of you. But again, none of this required a device of any kind.

And while you were waiting in doctors’ offices, there would often be magazines neatly arranged on end tables. It depended on the doctor, but sometimes they would subscribe to The New Yorker or National Geographic or Highlights magazine. I’ve read some great articles waiting for doctor appointments without downloading a single byte.

And I know that the device that delivers the content doesn’t really change it, does it? If Aristotle was great on stone tablets, he’ll be great on an iPad tablet, right? It’s just a little mind boggling that you can download half the Bodleian Library onto your smart phone, right next to the Cat Photo Clock app. It seems a little, well, sacrilegious.

I don’t mean to sound like a Luddite, though that seems to be a recurring theme with the GCN Lab lately. I think it’s great that we can read 420,000 books on our smart phones. I love technology, I love my cell phone, and I wouldn’t have passed college math without a calculator. I’m deeply grateful for all our technological achievements. I know I daily access worlds my grandparents never dreamed of, even with their finely tuned imaginations. I just worry sometimes this obsession with the small screen is at the expense of our imaginations and social skills.

God and Dog

Okay, we can get a dog now.

(HT: David Heddle at He Lives)

Seasons in the Sun

“There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under heaven:
a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot,
a time to kill and a time to heal, a time to tear down and a time to build.”
(Ecclesiastes 3:1-3, NIV)

Do you know what’s a bad sign?  When the pastor preaches a series on tithes, stressing the need for giving, and then announces a sermon based on this passage from Ecclesiastes.  You can pretty well bet that there are big changes afoot.  Or if he’s not happy for a long time, and then preaches a series from Titus on the qualifications of a pastor.  Yep, that’s a bad sign, too.

Pastor opened with the Ecclesiastes passage today, and then dropped the bomb – the church is closing.  Next week is the last service.  This came as a surprise to everyone except the church board.  Maybe it wasn’t such a surprise, because giving has been way down, and he just finished an extended series on the importance of tithes.  Apparently that series didn’t have its intended effect.

At a previous church, the pastor seemed to have lost his enthusiasm for preaching, and then preached a several week series from Titus.  Uh, oh.  Sure enough, he then announced that “God had called him elsewhere in ministry.”

What’s the right way to close a church, or to announce your resignation as a pastor?  Is there a right way?  In both instances, there were misunderstandings, hurt feelings, anger, and finally for most, acceptance that God is in control, not us.  Obviously we haven’t worked through all of that in the present case, but I trust and pray that it will happen.

No Expectation of Privacy

I’ve long held that if you own any kind of wireless-capable device (cell phone, laptop, pager, digital camera, etc.) it is vulnerable to eavesdropping. Nothing to worry about, though. Your government would NEVER do anything against your interests….

Feds push for tracking cell phones

Even though police are tapping into the locations of mobile phones thousands of times a year, the legal ground rules remain unclear, and federal privacy laws written a generation ago are ambiguous at best. On Friday, the first federal appeals court to consider the topic will hear oral arguments (PDF) in a case that could establish new standards for locating wireless devices.

In that case, the Obama administration has argued that warrantless tracking is permitted because Americans enjoy no “reasonable expectation of privacy” in their–or at least their cell phones’–whereabouts. U.S. Department of Justice lawyers say that “a customer’s Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the phone company reveals to the government its own records” that show where a mobile device placed and received calls.

Those claims have alarmed the ACLU and other civil liberties groups, which have opposed the Justice Department’s request and plan to tell the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia that Americans’ privacy deserves more protection and judicial oversight than what the administration has proposed.

“This is a critical question for privacy in the 21st century,” says Kevin Bankston, an attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who will be arguing on Friday. “If the courts do side with the government, that means that everywhere we go, in the real world and online, will be an open book to the government unprotected by the Fourth Amendment.”

I’m no fan of the ACLU, but at least somebody is minding the store. (HT: CNet)