Bloggers always seem to gripe about the MSM, and it’s certainly fair to say that for the most part, I despise journalists. What was once an honored profession and an institution that made America great is now an ongoing performance art piece entitled “Hubris.”
This article about Helen Thomas’ dislodgement from her front row seat at White House press conferences is illuminating:
As for how she thinks the next White House will handle the press, she said, “I think reporters should pin down the candidates and get them to almost sign on a dotted line that they’re going to give regular news conferences. It’s the only institution in our society where a president can be questioned on a regular basis. If he’s not questioned, he can operate solo, as a dictator.”
It amazes me that a woman of her age and experience could believe such a ridiculous premise. Our founding fathers provided checks and balances. It is Congress and the Supreme Court who have the power from preventing a President from becoming a dictator. The press may assist in the functioning of those checks and balances – they publicize information, people contact their representatives in Congress and demand action – but the press is not the fourth branch of government. Their power is taken, not granted.
Although I don’t believe it was intended, the Frontline series News War includes interview after interview to drive the point home. This interview has a telling quote where Bill Keller describes his motives in becoming a serial exposer of classified government programs:
[There are] several reasons for writing about it, but I think the main one, again, is this context: the concentration of executive power. This is a program that was taking place without the kind of congressional oversight that you would normally expect. There were some members of Congress who knew about it; there were quite a few members of Congress who normally would have been apprised of a program who did not know about it. … [emphasis added]
In this quote he’s referring to the Times’ exposure of the SWIFT program, which used to help us “connect the dots” by tracking terrorist financing. The Times’ ombudsman later admitted that the program broke no laws and perhaps it wasn’t such a “swift” idea to expose it. “Sorry” isn’t good enough, and while the ombudsman may have expressed regret, Keller certainly has not. It is clear that he would do it again, given the chance. There is no excuse for this. No laws were broken by the programs Keller exposed, and they were succeeding. Congress had been notified; just evidently not to Keller’s satisfaction. I don’t think anyone expects the media to kowtow to any administration. But neither do we expect it to take the arbitrary position against one that Keller admits having.
Having elevated themselves to such a position of authority, the press has an obligation to not be partisan or arbitrary, and to exercise sound judgment. That they refuse to do so has earned them the disgust of the majority of Americans. A recent Zogby poll has revealed that 71.4% of Americans are dissatisfied with the quality of journalism. 55.4% describe blogging as “important to the future of journalism.” While 85.3% of people describe “professional journalism” as important to the future of journalism, “citizen journalism” is also described as important to the future of journalism by 74.4% of the people surveyed. 65.4% of people believe that traditional journalism is out of touch with what Americans want from their news, where only 23.6% believe it is not.
The inevitable result of their hubris is that the media is talking themselves out of their jobs. While this may serve the cause of justice – they don’t deserve their jobs anymore – it doesn’t serve the American people. We need a free press to aid – not replace – our constitutional system of checks and balances. The situation can be salvaged if they would just return to their original mission: to deliver facts impartially. It will be a tragedy if they do not.
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Right Pundits, Random Dreamer, The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson’s Website, A Blog For All, Adam’s Blog, Big Dog’s Weblog, Maggie’s Notebook, basil’s blog, Shadowscope, Common Folk Using Common Sense, Stuck On Stupid, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, The Bullwinkle Blog, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Rightlinx, third world county, Allie Is Wired, stikNstein… has no mercy, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, Planck’s Constant, Renaissance Blogger, The Pink Flamingo, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, and Gone Hollywood, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Face it, no one can “deliver facts impartially”. What is needed is open, transparent admission of bias and openness to hearing/publishing other points of view, freely, without disingenuous spin. What we have now is a cabal of Mass Media Podpeople who all talk/write as though they recieve their daily mind meld from a Mother Ship orbiting Uranus. Yes, that much our of touch, that much in lock step and in denial of the fact that they are both out of touch and in mindless, unanimous lock step.
Sure, there are non-Mass Media Podpeople with a small minority voice in Oldstream Media, but the issue is that they are, for the most part, locked OUT of “news” reporting and what reportage we have simply lies about that fact, among many.
This all leads to a rousing affirmation of your post title, “The Breathtaking Arrogance of Reporters”… an affirmation that avows that the “breathtaking” aspect is largely because of the raw sewage stench of lies.
It would be nice. I think the current crop of journalists will have to be dead and buried before we’ll get that – maybe the next generation.
That’s wonderful. Wish I’d thought of it.
Hi all!
I want to all of you know, World is mine, and yoursite good
G’night