The Jena 6: Mychal Bell's Criminal History

I have posted a lot of about the Jena 6, and nearly all of it has been supportive. I still believe that attempted second-degree murder charges are excessive and that this should have been handled within the juvenile justice system. But I have to acknowledge that several commenters (From Jena, James Black, Lillie) who have insisted all along that Mychal Bell had priors were correct. While I don’t necessarily agree with the way those priors were characterized (“Bell terrorized his own community,” etc.) this article confirms the fact. While it’s undisputed that Mychal Bell was an honor roll student, it is now also proved that he had a criminal record, including violent crimes, starting two years before the Justin Barker beating.

  • Battery – 12/25/2005
  • Criminal damage to property – 7/25/2006
  • Battery – 9/2006
  • Criminal damage to property – 9/2006

This explains the fact that Bell’s bail was much higher than the others.  As I said, I still disagree with the 2nd degree attempted murder charge and the fact that 5 of the 6 are being charged as adults in any event – and for those who use Bell’s priors to justify it, how does that factor into the fact that the other 5 in the Jena 6 are still facing that charge?  However, this is important information and should be noted by all Jena 6 defenders.

Comments

  1. From Jena says:

    Laura:

    The judge has yet to go through the others’ criminal records yet. I suspect one or two of them have criminal juvenile records, but nothing like Mychal Bell’s. Robert Bailey was involved with almost every racially charged incident in town, so I’m skeptical that he has a squeaky clean record.

    I guess we can only wait and see how everything turns out. I hope the judge looks past the race issue (which I suspect he will) and makes the right decision. I know you and me differ on what the “right decision” is.

    Btw, did you read J.P. Mauffray’s comment about the evidence:

    “The weight of the evidence against the defendant: Mauffray said it was “pretty weighty” considering the jury convicted Bell.”

    Weighty? That’s pretty funny.

  2. Laura says:

    Mauffrey’s comment was kind of unresponsive, don’t you think? As the sentence reads, it’s “weighty” because Bell was convicted. But if Blane Williams had put on any kind of defense, and the evidence had not been ALL on the prosecutions side, would it still have been “weighty?” The total lack of defense plus Bell’s priors pretty much sealed it, but things could have been very different. I’m also still VERY upset about the reports of half the jury having connections to the prosecution – you have not commented on that as far as I know – anything to add from your perspective?

  3. From Jena says:

    Laura:

    I only know who a couple of the jurors were. They both have no relation or friendship to Reed Walters as far as I know.

    I plan on looking into this further for you. It’s something I don’t know much about yet. “Jena Person 2″ would know more about this than I would. Can you put anything here, Jena Person 2?

    I know a relative of one of the jurors, and according to the relative, the juror has received death threats.

    This is just a simple observation being from Jena, but any person running for a public office (like district attorney) is gonna get out and “poke the bushes” to try and win support. With the entire parish only having around 13,000 people in it, it’s very easy for him to know people in the jury pool.

    Again, I’m no scholar of law, but isn’t this the way it works:

    There is a pool of jurors and the prosecution and the defense each “weed out” individuals during jury selection. I saw this on Devil’s Advocate, but am not sure if this is the way it actually works or not. If this IS the case, the defense team had as much control over the jury selection as the prosecution did. If this is the case, it would mean that an impartial jury would partly rest on the shoulders of the weak Mychal Bell defense team. But again, that’s only theory.

  4. CommonSense says:

    The defense team actually typically has more control of the jury selection process

  5. From Jena says:

    It’s strange how you don’t see any of those people who are so angry about the Jena 6 situation saying anything on this article.

    …very strange indeed….

  6. From Jena 2 says:

    I agree with ‘From Jena’ about lack of comments on this blog. As far as the jury goes, I heard one of Alan Bean’s comments on one of his radio interviews that the only man on the jury graduated high school with Justin Barker’s father. I am guessing they finished high school around 25 years ago. I graduated from high school 5 years ago and I still keep in contact with 3 or 4 people out of a graduating class of 120. I cannot imagine what its going to be like in 20 years. As far the jury knowing witnesses and the DA goes. It is almost impossible to pick out 6 people out of 100 or so and none of them never have any contact with 25 witnesses or the DA in a parish of around 13000 people. I also know that two of the jurors were from the Olla/Urania area which is about 16 miles from the Jena city limits, so I doubt they really knew a lot of details about this case or even any of the witnesses considering they were all JHS students.

  7. Audra Fleming says:

    This is truly outrageous! My thoughts and prayers go out to all of these young men and their families. You never know when it could be your turn.

  8. Fedup says:

    This is just wrong. Who’s to say the Mycheal Bell’s past criminal history is not made up bogus charges like the ones that he is being charged with now. When you live in a society where white people have the final say its very hard for us african americans to get a far trail. And that DA needs to be fired and convicted himself. Hell put him an all black jail and watch how his life disappears with the struck of a pen.

  9. CommonSense says:

    Fedup-
    As stated in another post, a juvenile’s past criminal history must be introduced by the defense first. Don’t blaim the DA if his defense attorney did a piss poor job.

  10. From Jena says:

    Fedup

    LOOK OUT, THE ALIENS ARE COMING TO TAKE US AWAY!!!!!!!

  11. Amy Barton says:

    When you live in a society where white people have the final say its very hard for us african americans to get a far trail.—Fedup

    This is a terribly racist statement. It implies that (1) only white people have authority in government; local, state, or federal (does that mean that you think that other races aren’t intelligent or competent enough to get jobs in government?) and (2) that white people are racist…i note that you did not say “some” or even “most”..you simply said white people, a direct implication that all white people are racist. This ITSELF is a RACIST statement.

  12. afterthought says:

    I have been reading the posts for the last two days and I am quite concerned about some of the assumptions that have been made regarding race and Mr. Bells criminal history. First, African Americans cannot be racist because racism is associated with entitlement and in the history of these United States African American’s have never been entitled to anything. Secondly, without having been to the town of Jena it does appear that the this town is racist in the manner it keeps the African American population somewhat segragated from the white population. By this I mean the informal and formal power structure in the town. As for Mr. Bell, he has a juvenile record of two counts of battery and two counts of destruction of property. This does not seem like violent crimes to consistute his bail being set ridiculously high.

    [afterthought, battery is by definition a violent crime. Having said that, I still think that a possible 22 years for a high school fight is just wrong. And yes, African Americans CAN be racist. Just because that's how YOU define racism doesn't make it so. - Laura]

  13. CommonSense says:

    Afterthought-
    African Americans have never been entitled to anything in this country? They get jobs that they are less qualified for based on their race. They get into schools with less qualifications and receive more in the way of scholarships. These are just a few examples of Affirmative Action, something that you apparently have never hear of.

    Laura-
    Thank you for attaching that sidenote to this silly comment.

  14. Lets be real says:

    Because I have time on my hands I’ll respond to some of these ludicrous comments!!!!Sad thing is I believe some of these posts are made by people with racists tendencies and they don’t even realize it!But such is life.
    I can only guess at why some of the supporters of the Jena 6 students have not left comments but I’ll take a crack at it.
    1. For the simple fact that their comments get shut down but ignorant people who attempt to speak for and/ or justify the unjust acts towards people of color.
    2. Some people would rather act upon their ideas…stand behind their beliefs than waste it on people who will never understand what it feels like to be oppressed.
    3. You might wanna go back to school and get educated on racism since living in this world has failed to do that!Racism occurs where prejudice and power come into play…While Black people can be prejudice, the power they have is clearly not adequate to allow for racism to take a hold.
    —-The last comment by Common Sense…please, lets get serious about life….you’re living in a dream world if you think that all Black people benefit from Affirmative Action!!!If you are educated on US history in its entirety you will know that there have been disparities between what Black and White people have access to…and therefore the playing field has not been level.If you think that its level now, it just goes to show just how delusional you are.
    —-From Jena 2: while your memory might not allow you to remember people that far back, other people can. Honestly, if you live in a small town….or any town for that manner, and you have similar interests with people you graduate with, you will obviously keep in touch and undoubtedly feel somewhat obliged to them!
    —-It’s interesting how common sense only responded to part of the comment from fed up!Why did you ignore the fact that prior convictions could have been racially urged on!We only see what we want to see.
    Yes, I admit that because I am African-American most of my comments and attitudes will be shaped by that fact…but I realize and acknowledge that my thoughts might be bias.But, this is clearly a racially splurged issue and the fact that people can say that it has nothing to do with race is just ridiculous!Let’s not lose sight of the real issue and take to attacking each other!!!These boys lives will never be the same and they have exposed the racial divides that exist whether we choose to acknowledge it or not!No offense intended to anyone but please…lets be real!

  15. CommonSense says:

    Lets Be Real-
    Your right, the playing field has not been leveled, in many cases African Americans actually have more access to things as a result of Affirmative Action. If a white student and black student with the same grades, extracurriculars, ect. are vying for the last spot on the college admissions list, the black student will be accepted first, and that is just a fact. As for me not responding to the other part of the idiotic post from fed up, where in there does he mention the previous charges being racially motivated. He just illustrates how idiotic he is by saying that his prior record does not display a history of violence. I didn’t comment on this because laura did a great job of discussion with him the meaning of “battery” as a legal term.
    And by the way, you are correct, these boys lives never will be the same. They chose to commit a crime and that will forever follow them. Hopefully the horrible act of hanging the nooses will follow those boys as well. Unfortunately, hanging nooses isn’t a crime so they will not have a record following them that will serve to change their lives forever.

  16. sad to say says:

    SURE THEY WILL THIS WILL NOT BE UNDEALT WITH. EVERYONE WILL KNOW OF THERE KKK BACKGROUND

  17. Are you serious? says:

    CommonSense,

    Do you actually believe it is easier for African Americans to get ahead than white people?

    Do you believe Affirmative Action has helped more black people than Racism has hurt?

    I thought everyone knew AA helps white women more than any other demographic, but I guess not.

  18. James Black says:

    LETS BE REAl
    You said a mouth full when you said “we only see what we want to see” that describes you to a tee. I am sure anything you see on here that is against these thugs has to be made up. After all there is no way that a black person could have done all these things. I guess you think M. Vick is innocent, That guy who beat the 91 year old man on video I guess that was made up to. Heck I bet you even believe OJ is innocent. Come on now do you believe a white person killed Tupac and Biggy. Surely no black man could commit these terrible crimes. What about Mike Tyson , Kobe Bryant, Jason Williams, just to name a few. Look at these role models. How do you expect the young people to act when this is all they see. But I know all of these things were made up to keep the black man down.

    There is not one black person in this country who was a slave, nor were their parents, or their grandparents. If you trace any persons heritage far enough back you will find oppression of some kind, whether it be religious, social, or racial. Sure slavery was more recent but no one living today had anything to do with it. There are lots of blacks in Africa now who are slaves to their own people. These are the people you should be trying to help. Instead you complain about everything because you can, not because it is justified. Mychal Bells time will hopefully do him some good. He was on a path to either kill someone or be killed himself. How would you like him terrorizing the black community where you live.

  19. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH says:

    Wow. As a first time reader of this site, I have to say that I am very disappointed in what I am reading. However, I do feel a need to add my two cents.
    Racism exists…..point blank. SOME African Americans are racist… SOME caucasians are racist…. SOME asians are racist… and on an on it continues. Affirmative action is a reaction to racism which has not only benefitted African Americans but also Asians, Hispanics and YES Caucasians as well. And before we argue that fact, I know a few Caucasians who have benefitted, myself being one of them…. so this is a dead issue. That being said, let’s get to the real issue. Does any individual who participates in a school fight — AND YES THAT IS WHAT THIS IS REGARDLESS OF WHAT CAUSED IT — deserve 22 years in prison??? Second degree murder?? come on. I am sure that some of the individuals participating in this debate have been in at least one fight in their lifetime… the only difference is that most of us were not arrested for it. But let’s say that you were… do you really believe that 22 years is what you should get? Let’s truly put this in perspective. I am in no way making excuses for ANY of the individuals involved (on both sides)… this whole situation is hideous but if we are going to punish someone at least let the punishment fit the crime. Was the trial held in a racist area? from reading articles such as the excerpt I am posting at the end of this comment (from pww.org) and all other overseas newspapers that reported on this … I would say YES, BUT how is arguing this OPINION going to help Mychall now? Does his history play a part? maybe.. but before we argue on that fact, do we know EXACTLY what happened? Battery could have been just another fight. Property Damage could mean that he keyed someones car. Is everyone on this site trying to tell me that we do not know of a situation where this is possible??? (for example, someone gets caught up in a love triangle that resulted in a fight and/or property damage in which the police gets involved.) If yes is your answer then you are lucky. Please get ALL of the facts before we rant and rave on and on about nothing.
    And to Mr. Black –> M Vick??? Tupac?? Biggie??? Why are we even mentioning them?? Individuals from ALL races have committed some horrible crime at some point in time. So your point on bringing them into this is DUMB. And YES many people in todays society have not been enslaved themselves BUT there are those who have felt (and still feeling) the wrath of the KKK, skinheads and other incidents of TRUE racism.
    Africa is not the only place where injustice occurs. As an example of this, I met a man a few years ago, who is now about 35 years old, who showed me a thin scar around his neck (and the newspaper articles reporting this incident) from being hung from a tree with a fishline because HE WAS the “INITIATION” for a caucasian person joining the KKK… He was lucky because they did not completely hang him… they allowed the tip of his toes to touch the ground. He was rescued by a passer-by before his life was extinguished. IT happened in the US… right under OUR noses. So Before you start arguing about what is being done in other Countries, you need to at least admit to what is happening in your own. How can we help others when we can’t even help ourselves?

    Terrorizing??? He was on a path to “KILL”?? How do you know this? Can you see his future? Hell can you see mine?? cuz I would love to know what PATH my life is heading towards. Saying mean things will not help the issue and right now your comments are just UGLY. There are individuals who were once troubled teens that have gone on to become JUDGES, LAWYERS, POLICE OFFICERS, and other outstanding professionals as well as a dominating force in their communities. Judge Mathis is a perfect example of this….

    To all -> I am hoping that from henceforth statments of substance will be written.

    Here is the excerpt that I copied from http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/11397/1/141/

    “The fight was the culmination of a series of racial incidents starting when whites responded to Black students sitting under the “white tree” at their school by hanging three nooses from the tree. The white jury and white prosecutor and all white supporters of the white victim were all on one side of the courtroom. The Black defendant, 17-year-old Mychal Bell, and his supporters were on the other. “

  20. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH says:

    I have a bit of a retraction to make. I believe Judge Mathis did go to prison… so he was not the best example to give. Even with this retraction, I am very sure that you understand the point I was trying to make.

  21. From Jena says:

    Enough is Enough:

    Thank you for the link.

    Looks like I have more emailing to do. This article, like nearly every other article I’ve seen so far, contains one-sided bias and reports that are completely false.

  22. CommonSense says:

    Are you serious-

    I don’t think I ever said it had Affirmative Action helped more people than racism had hurt. I wrote that in response to an earlier post regarding the fact that racism from blacks towards whites couldn’t exist because blacks had never had a sense of entitlement. And I think it is certainly fair to say that Affirmative Action is an example of african american entitlement.

    And honestly, if you were to do a study on an african american and a white person from the time they were born until the time they door, both from identical socio-economic backgrounds, I really don’t think that the white person would have an easier time getting ahead. He certainly wouldn’t have an easier time getting into college or getting a job with the government.

  23. From Jena 2 says:

    Here is a report with more direct quotes from the courtroom from the day of the hearing.

  24. From Jena 2 says:

    “This is just wrong. Who’s to say the Mycheal Bell’s past criminal history is not made up bogus charges like the ones that he is being charged with now. When you live in a society where white people have the final say its very hard for us african americans to get a far trail. And that DA needs to be fired and convicted himself. Hell put him an all black jail and watch how his life disappears with the struck of a pen.”

    Bogus charges that all have witnesses black and white.

  25. From Jena 2 says:
  26. James Black says:

    Enough is Enough>Well here again is a person seeing something for the first time and getting all bentout of whack. The comments I made that you thought were just DUMB was in response to previous posts that you know nothing about. In fact it was on another thread but the same person was on this one. As for being one sided you will see this is the only one you will find where people are starting to understand what really is going on. I only post on here to defend my community black and white for the total BS that was first reported on this case. I an attempt to sell more papers and get higher ratings they are trying to make things a race issue when they are not. Sure I agree the noose incident was inappropiate and in bad taste. I also am sure it hurt some feelings. If it had not been for all the pot stirring from outsiders with their own agenda it would have been taken care of, and justice would prevail. So before you get on your high horse backup and see what is happening here. Also I am not denying racism exist all over the world. You will read about the 300 protesters coming to Jena from all over. Dont you think there would have been more than 10 people from Jena there if any of this was true. Yes there was a all white jury, but the blacks called didnt show up. It is a computerized selection system so there was no conspiracy there. Maybe if more were registered to vote there might have been more on the list. I believe that outsiders told the ones on the list not to show up so they could use that in case he was convicted. I know what happened here I know all involved on both sides. 40 witnesses dont lie. Everything done here was legal and investigated by the FBI as so. All I can say is sit back and watch because all of this means absolutely nothing in the scheme of things. It isnt going to help Bell not one bit. If 10000 people show up from all over the country on his arraignment day it wont help him one bit. I keep telling you people all he will do is 1 year and the others will get probation. Just sit back and watch.

    [James, inappropriate and in poor taste doesn't BEGIN to cover the nooses. You should know, being from the south, what a noose means. It's a threat, just the same as drawing your finger across your throat or forming a "gun" with your fingers and pointing it at someone. I'm not saying it's a threat they intended to carry out, but it is a threatening gesture. Furthermore it was NOT "being taken care of." Had the parents been allowed to speak at the school board meeting that would have helped. A more appropriate punishment for the noose hangers would have helped. But things didn't get totally fired up until after those opportunities had come and gone. And 40 witnesses were NOT in perfect agreement on what happened. The FBI DID NOT investigate whether selective prosecution is happening. According to Washington's own words, he conducted a very superficial investigation into a few discrete areas, and didn't touch that one AT ALL - it certainly was not the substantive investigation people have been asking for or that you're implying took place. You're being disingenuous. Stop it. - Laura]

  27. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH says:

    Jena – > Can you provide links/excerpts to articles that you believe are more accurate? I’ve only heard of this case for the VERY FIRST TIME last night via email… Where the link I provided above was one of the many listed.

    Thanks

  28. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH says:

    James Black – > Thank you very much for that explanation of events. I did not know that you were responding to another discussion from another thread… and I am sure that not everyone who read it ON THIS THREAD knew that either. Just to let you know, I was not bent out of whack… I read what I read and responded. You are correct in that I am a first timer.. but I am a first timer looking for the facts. That being said, if ANYONE has knowledge of articles, etc. pertaining to this case that you feel represents the TRUTH, could you please share the info. Thanks

  29. From Jena says:

    No one has brought this to light.

    THINK about it.

    If the town of Jena…..DA Reed Walters….and Judge J.P. Mauffray are see eager to convict black people in our community,

    WHY

    did Mychal Bell get ONLY parole for 4 violent criminal acts?

    This is his FIFTH violent criminal act, this is his FIFTH chance to turn his life around. I’m of the VERY strong opinion that if my town is as most of you defending the Jena 6 characterize it, that the DA and Judge would have slapped the book at him the FIRST time he committed a crime.

    Have you ever thought about that?

    Trumped up charges? Show me PROOF that Mychal Bells previous charges are trumped up. It’s plain and simple, some people (white & black) absolutely refuse to take responsibility for their own actions…and when you have people like ENOUGH IS ENOUGH trying to convince people that every bad thing you do is justified because the white person is oppressing you, it makes it very easy to just…do whatever you want.

    ….and apparently that is just what Mychal Bell has done.

    I’m also of the opinion that people like YOU ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and others in your community are responsible for some of these young black kids who have a blatant disregard for the law & justice system, simply because they have been taught by people like you that it’s the “white man”‘s system and you might as well just give up.

    Many in the white community have racist issues, but many in the black community do not want people in their community to take responsibility for their own actions. Both sides continue a cyclical system of racism. If both issues could be worked out, racism would be much less existent.

  30. Melissa says:

    It seems to me that this entire situation has really been blown up. I first heard of this all today (hence, the lack of coverage in the Northern U.S.) However, I’m not even going to comment on the Jena 6…It disturbs me deeply there are families (parents, siblings, grand-parents, aunts, uncles, etc) teaching children hatred against one another. I don’t care about slavery (I DO but it has no bearing on this), it’s over and illegal…What I care about now is changing the way people think about one another. I live in a state where there are mostly white people and very few blacks…the rest are Native American. If I wanted to I could be racist. I’m not…every single race has it’s “white trash”, “thugs” or whatever anyone really wants to call it. There are wonderful people in all races…we are all children of God and deserve respect from everyone. The only time that is compromised is when you break the law or use bad judgement (such as hanging the nooses). At that point in time you should be punished for what you do. People need to be held accountable for their actions, but our justice system sometimes drops the ball big time. It saddens me to come to the realization that so much hatred and racism still exists. This situation wouldn’t be here if there weren’t extremists on both sides.

    And now these three remain: faith, hope and love.
    But the greatest of these is love.

    1 Corinthians 13:13

    LOVE ONE ANOTHER…LOVE HAS NO COLOR…

  31. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! says:

    I can’t believe all of this…. when I first heard about what was going on in Jena I was outraged and distraught. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing and now I come on here and read this. People please haven’t you paid attention to anything in your history classes? If you ask me this just looks like history is repeating itself.

    Enough Is Enough I feel you all the way but for James black to sit on here and say that they deserve to do time in jail does not make any since. From an outsider looking in… Dang…. are you involved in it? You sound real bitter and have no sympathy for these young men. How would you feel if it was your child going through this and they told him he was looking at 22 years in prison for a school yard fight? I don’t care what anybody says that’s outrageous and unjust. Convicted felons don’t even get that much time in prison, and they have done way more and worst crimes then this. For goodness sake it was a school fight!! No one deserves to go to jail for something as simple and petty as that.

    Did they lock up that Caucasian boy who beat up Robert Bailey at the all white party??? NO they did nothing. Did they lock up the person who pulled the shotgun out on them at the store? No they did nothing. From the articles I read there was a school coach there talking to Justin Barker and he said that it was not Bell and in fact it was someone else. Why wasn’t he called as a witness?

    http://www.michaeldavidmurphy.com is where I got most of my info from.

    What does his prior record have to do with this case???? Not a darn thing, this is a school fight not a homicide. Now I can see if someone actually died and they had to pull background records of all the parties involved. But for that to be done for a school fight was a waste of taxpayer’s money.

    Why was it reported that Justin and his family was eating lunch with the so called witnesses? If you ask me I think it’s all a lie and just another way of putting African Americans back in check.

    And as for the attention this has created…. Your right people are going to go and protest. Forget the 10 people that were there the black population that is there are probably afraid to take a stand because of the fact that they do live in that town and have to deal with those types of people and we don’t. How are you so sure that he will only serve 1year in jail and the rest on probation? Even 1 year in prison is still harsh like I said it was a school yard fight.

    EITHER WAY YOU LOOK AT IT …..WHATS RIGHT IS RIGHT AND WHATS WRONG IS WRONG!!!!

    MY HEART GOES OUT TO THE JENA 6 BOYS AND THERE FAMILIES AND NO ONE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD BE SUBJECTED TO SUCH HARSH PUNISHMENT FOR SOMETHING PETY AS THAT. AND YES I SAID PETY!!!

  32. From Jena says:

    Enough is Enough:

    I apologize for aiming that comment at you, I’ve read back on your posts and you don’t seem to feel that way. That comment was direct more towards people like Fedup and in response to Post #8. So please don’t take those comments as directed towards you, it was an accident.

    I’ll give you some links later on if I get home early enough tonight. I think Laura plans to get some more information pretty soon, so keep up with this story on this site.

    Plus, I said on another article on this site, that I get the strange feeling that the six on one beating is not gonna be the end of it. So keep up with the story as it evolves.

  33. CommonSense says:

    AND YES, YOU SPELLED PETTY WRONG TWICE

  34. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! says:

    COMMON SENSE…..MAKE SOME SENSE MY SPELLING IS NOT IN QUESTION HERE.

  35. CommonSense says:

    THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!-

    You are right, your spelling is not in question. They often say, however, that grammar and spelling along with basic mathematical ability are a good judge of general intelligence….I am not implying that you are not intelligence, just that simply clerical errors like that may detract from the argument you are trying to make.

    “People please haven’t you paid attention to anything in your history classes? If you ask me this just looks like history is repeating itself.”
    How couldn’t we? Every history book I had in high school devoted 3/4 of their pages to black history while summing up the Cold War in less than a chapter.

    “You sound real bitter and have no sympathy for these young men. How would you feel if it was your child going through this and they told him he was looking at 22 years in prison for a school yard fight?”
    No, I don’t have much sympathy. If my son and his friends jumped a kid, I would tell him to come outside and square up one on one with me because real men don’t gangbeat people. When I was in school, there were no gang beatings, if kids had disagreements, they solved it one on one. The danged level is raised when that many kids are going after one kid, fortunately he wasn’t injured worse. As far as the 22 years in prison, why don’t you relax until he is actually sentenced?

    “Did they lock up that Caucasian boy who beat up Robert Bailey at the all white party???”
    Actually, that caucasian boy plead guily to simply assualt. Stop reading biased, one-sided, blog sites. They are clearly not providing you with the whole picture.

    “What does his prior record have to do with this case???? Not a darn thing, this is a school fight not a homicide. Now I can see if someone actually died and they had to pull background records of all the parties involved. But for that to be done for a school fight was a waste of taxpayer’s money.”
    His priors were introduced by his own defense team, because that is law when dealing with juveniles. Also, four previous offense that indicate a history of violence coupled with a fifth (also violent) offense paint a pretty disturbing picture of this kind that has apparently now become a martyr.

    “Why was it reported that Justin and his family was eating lunch with the so called witnesses? If you ask me I think it’s all a lie and just another way of putting African Americans back in check. ”
    What valid media source reported this? Please let everyone in here know.

    “Even 1 year in prison is still harsh like I said it was a school yard fight”
    I don’t know where you went to school, but where I am from, 6 boys beating one kid is hardly a normal schoolyard fight.

    You, like many others, may want to consider looking at outside sources for information as opposed to spewing out the unvalidated information you are getting from michaeldavidmurphy.com

  36. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    WOW!!!!!!! COMMON SENSE ARE YOU AN ENGLISH TEACHER OR SOMETHING???? I THOUGHT THIS SITE WAS SUPPOSE TO BE FOR COMMENTS ON THE JENA 6 NOT FOR YOU TO CORRECT INDIVIDUALS ON THEIR SPELLING AND GRAMMAR…..IT IS ALL A BLACK/WHITE RACE ISSUE BECAUSE IF THIS HAD HAPPEN TO A BLACK KID NONE OF THIS WOULD BE HAPPENING….. WE CAN ALL SEE THAT FROM THE BALCK KID GETTING JUMPED ON AT THE “ALL WHITE” PARTY AND NOTHING WAS DONE…..MY HEART GOES OUT TO THE JENA 6 IN THEIR FAMILY….I WILL CONTINUE TO PRAY FOR YOU THAT FAIR JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED…….

  37. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    AND YES I KNOW I SPELLED BLACK WRONG……ON PURPOSE

  38. From Jena says:

    THIS IS AN OUTRAGE:

    I dismiss most people who put egregious comments about Jena as misinformed. Some I believe are so ready to “pounce” on the racism issue that they don’t CARE what the truth is. I think you’re a little of both.

    You don’t realize this, but MOST media reports I have read contain information that has been FACTUALLY proven wrong. And EVERY media report or article I’ve read online contain bias, most to a severe degree. No one bothered to read the statements people made about the incidents. Most black activists who have written these articles you read online are just as described above, so ready to pounce on the racism issue that they don’t care what the truth is. They only interviewed families of the attackers (the Jena 6) and their story is severely skewed to one side. Some of the incidents in Jena are debatable, I agree (like the charges brought on the Jena 6). But many are skewed to the side that has very little evidence, while the other side that has very valid information that argues the side they are reporting is not being mentioned at all.

    We live in this town and we know. We live it every day. Yes, people may think our perception is wrong because we are gonna bitterly defend our town and way of life no matter what. But consider this: The Jena 6′s families will bitterly defend their relatives because they have alot more to lose than we do. So that argument can go both ways.

  39. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    COMMON SENSE!!!
    YES I KNOW I SPELLED BLACK WRONG ON PURPOSE……THANKS

  40. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! says:

    FIRST OF ALL FOR YOU TO SIT HERE AND CLEARY PICK THROUGH EVERYTHING I SAID INSTEAD OF UNDERSTANDING THE MAIN POINT I AM TRYING TO MAKE IS PETTY BY ITSELF. DID YOU GET THAT “P-E-T-T-Y”

    FOR YOU TO SAY: “You are right; your spelling is not in question. They often say, however, that grammar and spelling along with basic mathematical ability are a good judge of general intelligence….I am not implying that you are not intelligence, just that simply clerical errors like that may detract from the argument you are trying to make.”

    DON’T YOU MEAN INTELLIGENT??? NOW WE ARE IN THE SAME BOAT. FYI I USED SPELL CHECK BEFORE I SENT IT OUT THE FIRST TIME. ANYWAY IF YOU WERE PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT I WROTE PRIOR TO THIS, I WROTE WHERE I GOT OF MY INFO FROM. MAYBE YOU NEED TO GO BACK AND RE-READ WHAT I WROTE THE FIRST TIME. I ALSO GOOGLED JENA 6 AND IT WILL GIVE YOU A LIST OF ARTICLE PERTAINING TO THE ALLEGATIONS.

    NOW LET ME GO DOWN TO YOUR LEVEL:
    “Every history book I had in high school devoted 3/4 of their pages to black history while summing up the Cold War in less than a chapter”

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME RIGHT NOW I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO KNOW WHAT HISTORY BOOK THAT WAS! WHEN I WAS IN SCHOOL THE ONLY TIME WE LEARNED ABOUT BLACK HISTORY WAS IN FEBRUARY DURING BLACK HISTORY MONTH OTHER THEN THAT IT WAS NEVER TAUGHT.

    AND YES I WAS ALWAYS TAUGHT THAT FIGHTING SHOULD BE ONE-ON-ONE INSTEAD OF A GANG OF PEOPLE. I WAS TAUGHT THAT GANG BEATING PEOPLE AS YOU PUT IT MADE YOU NOTHING MORE THEN A PUNK. AND FOR THE RECORD WHERE I COME FROM YOU SEE PEOPLE GET BEAT UP BY A GANG A LOT BUT YOU DON’T SEE THEM GETTING MAJOR TIME IN PRISON FOR IT.

    IN THE SAME SINCE I AM NOT SAYING WHAT THEY DID WAS RIGHT I AM JUST CLEARLY SAYING THE PUNISHMENT IS HARSH FOR THESE YOUNG BOYS…BLACK OR WHITE. AND FOR THOSE WHO SAY I WAS MAKING THIS OUT TO BE A RACIST ISSUE…. IS MERELY MISCONSTRUING MY PERSONAL OPINION INTO SOMETHING THAT IT IS NOT. FROM WHAT I AM READING MAKES IT VERY CLEAR THAT RACISM HAS A HAND IN IT.

    GRANTED BELL HAD A PRIOR BACKGROUND BUT WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER BOYS THAT IS IN QUESTION. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK THAT THE PUNISHMENT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT ISSUING IS REALLY SUITABLE?

    HONESTLY?

    AS FAR AS THE INFORMATION I AM GETTING IS ONLY WHAT I AM READING ONLINE. YOU’RE RIGHT I DON’T LIVE THERE AND I WAS NOT THERE AT THE TIME WHEN THE FIGHT BROKE OUT AND I AM GUESSING YOU WEREN’T THERE EITHER. WE BOTH CAN ONLY GO FROM WHAT THE MEDIA IS DISPLAYING TO THE PUBLIC AND WHERE I AM AT RIGHT NOW… IT’S NOT MUCH!

  41. CommonSense says:

    THIS IS AN OUTRAGE SAYS: “ANYWAY IF YOU WERE PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT I WROTE PRIOR TO THIS, I WROTE WHERE I GOT OF MY INFO FROM. MAYBE YOU NEED TO GO BACK AND RE-READ WHAT I WROTE THE FIRST TIME”

    COMMON SENSE ORIGINALLY WROTE: “You, like many others, may want to consider looking at outside sources for information as opposed to spewing out the unvalidated information you are getting from michaeldavidmurphy.com”

    THIS IS AN OUTRAGE SAYS: “GRANTED BELL HAD A PRIOR BACKGROUND BUT WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER BOYS THAT IS IN QUESTION. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK THAT THE PUNISHMENT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT ISSUING IS REALLY SUITABLE?”

    Bell is the only one who has been convicted or stood trial at this point. The others are juveniles, and it has been stated here already that a juvenile’s priors cannot be brought up unless their defense team does so. So no one knows whether or not they have priors. And if they don’t, they probably will not face the same prospective punishment as Bell.

    ***PLEASE KNOW THE RELEVANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION OR ELSE YOUR POSTINGS WILL REMAIN TO BE COMPLETELY SPECULATIVE AND IRRELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION****

  42. CommonSense says:

    AND WE ARE NOT IN THE SAME BOAT SPELLING-WISE BECAUSE YOU USED AND EMPHASIZED PETTY TWICE IN THE TWO ADJOINING SENTENCES IN AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE WHATEVER POINT IT WAS YOU WERE TRYING TO MAKE.

  43. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! says:

    Ok look…. I am not going to sit here and go back and fourth with you about my grammar or my spelling mistakes. I said what I said and I meant just that! What I wrote about is clearly MY OPINION about the whole situation and what you say towards my opinion is not important to me. I am not hear to debate with you or anyone else as in who is right and who is wrong in this allegation but to simply express my feelings and give MY OPINION about it, which I am entitled to do. If you agree or disagree with my opinion still won’t change the fact of what is going on right now.

    Once again “I DO NOT FEEL THAT THE PUNISHMENT FITS THE CRIME.” And you can take that for what it is worth. My opinion does not reflect on race, I don’t care if you were black, white, purple, or green it still don’t matter. I will stand by saying “it is a harsh punishment for something like that.”

    And if you’re wondering I am bi-racial so I really don’t have a side as far as race is concern.

  44. Octatlogic101 says:

    What were the circumstances surrounding Bell’s sudden outburst of violent behavior. Did he just start attacking people? Who were these people?
    What happened to him around Christmas 2005?
    Battery – 12/25/2005
    Criminal damage to property – 7/25/2006
    Battery – 9/2006
    Criminal damage to property – 9/2006
    I remember when I was in school. I went to an all white school and I got into a least three fights a year because a white students would picking on me. Every year it was around the same time. When the teachers would show the movie Roots. The white students want to call me many colorful names.
    I fought back because I was the only Black in my class and I didn’t know then that some people are just ignorant. I grow out of hitting others when I’m scared or cornered.
    If I lived in Jena then I would probably be on death row for my fights.

    What ever the reason this started you should remember that these are still a bunch of children.
    Unfortunately the whole town of Jena will end up looking like a breeding ground for ignorant racist, over Childs play.

  45. From Jena says:

    I’ve still yet to hear an answer to my burning question:

    If the town of Jena is a town full of racial hatred, as many of you describe, why did Mychal Bell get FOUR chances before this one? Why was he allowed to commit four violent criminal acts before the DA finally slapped it to him?

    Have any of you thought of this?

    A town full or racism would have slapped the book at him the FIRST time, maybe the second…but this is the FIFTH!!!

    Seriously think about it…

  46. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    JENA
    MAYBE HE DIDN’T GET “SLAPPED WITH THE BOOK” (YOUR WORDS NOT MINE) THE FIRST FOUR TIMES BECAUSE HE WAS STILL A MINOR AND MAYBE THE FIRST FOUR ACTS WERE AGAINST PEOPLE OF HIS OWN RACE……….THE REASON HE’S GETTING HARSH PUNISHMENT NOW IS BECAUSE HE BEAT UP A CAUCASIAN KID…….I MEAN COME ON WHO GETS 22 YEARS IN PRISON FOR A SCHOOL FIGHT????

    I UNDERSTAND YOU WANT TO STAND UP FOR YOUR TOWN AND YOU SHOULD BUT LET’S BE REAL. RACE IS PLAYING A MAJOR FACTOR IN THIS CASE IN MY OPINION.

  47. From Jena says:

    Where is the Justice:

    “I MEAN COME ON WHO GETS 22 YEARS IN PRISON FOR A SCHOOL FIGHT????”

    I don’t know, you tell me. I’ve never heard of it before. Even Mychal Bell, who’s YET to be sentenced.

    And again, it wasn’t a school fight. It was a six on one beating. If this is what YOU call a fight, I’m very sorry your perception is skewed. A fight is when people are facing each other. This was underhanded and done when the guy was turned away from the attacker, then the rest was done when he was unconscious. You call that a fight?

    What if you were in the hospital under sedation and I walked in and started punching you? Would this be a fight?

    I don’t see your logic. Please explain.

  48. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    JENA
    FIRST OF ALL ……WERE YOU THERE TO SEE THAT HE WAS PUNCHED FROM BEHIND AND THAT HE WAS STILL BEING ATTACKED AS HE LAY ON THE GROUND UNCONSCIOUS??? OR ARE YOU GETTING THIS FROM ARTICLES THAT YOU READ JUST AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE?

    I HONESTLY DON’T BELIEVE THAT SIX KIDS JUMPED ON THIS ONE STUDENT BECAUSE “IN MY OPINION” HE WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN KNOCKED UNCONSCIOUS HE WOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD OR SERIOUSLY INJURED IF HE WAS BEATEN AS BADLY AS YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY HE WAS…….ANOTHER QUESTION IF HE WAS HURT SO BADLY FROM BEING JUMPED BY 6 PEOPLE WHY WAS HE TREATED AND RELEASED FROM THE HOSPITAL THAT SAME DAY THEN SEEN OUT HAVING FUN ACTING LIKE HIS NORMAL SELF LATER ON THAT DAY????

    EVERYTHING THAT HAS BEEN SAID ON HERE IS PEOPLE’S OPINION’S SO YOU NOR I NOR ANYONE ELSE CAN PASS JUDGEMENT ON THAT….OH AND ME BEING IN THE HOSPITAL UNDER SEDATION AND YOU WALK IN PUNCHING ME WAS WAY OVER EXADURATED THAT WAS NOT THE CASE HERE

    BESIDES IF I WAS UNDER SEDATION MY “GOONS” WOULD BE ON STAND BY NO ONE WOULD BE ABLE TO GET NEAR ME…..WHERE I’M FROM KIDS GET JUMPED ON BY GANGS OF PEOPLE AND SOMEIMES KILLED EVERYDAY BUT THEY DON’T LOOK AT FACING 22 YEARS IN PRISON…..DOESN’T MATTER HOW YOU SEE IT TO ME IT WAS STILL A FIGHT RATHER IT WAS ONE ON ONE OR NOT….IF YOUR TOWN BELIEVES IN SUCH HARSH PUNISHMENT FOR PEOPLE GETTING JUMPED BY MORE THAN ONE PERSON REGARDLESS OF RACE WHY WAS THE WHITE KIDS WHO BEAT UP THE ONE BLACK BOY AT THE PARTY NOT CONVICTED THIS WAY EVEN THOUGH IT DIN’T HAPPEN ON SHCOOL GROUNDS?????? LIKE SOMEONE SAID IN A PREVIOUS ARTICLE ALL OF THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED HAD THE WHITE KIDS WHO HUNG THE NOOSES RECEIVED HARSHER PUNISHMENT…..

  49. CommonSense says:

    WHERE IS THE JUSTICE:

    “WERE YOU THERE TO SEE THAT HE WAS PUNCHED FROM BEHIND AND THAT HE WAS STILL BEING ATTACKED AS HE LAY ON THE GROUND UNCONSCIOUS??? OR ARE YOU GETTING THIS FROM ARTICLES THAT YOU READ JUST AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE?”
    Not from articles, from multiple testimonies given during Mychal Bell’s trial.

    “I HONESTLY DON’T BELIEVE THAT SIX KIDS JUMPED ON THIS ONE STUDENT BECAUSE “IN MY OPINION” HE WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN KNOCKED UNCONSCIOUS HE WOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD OR SERIOUSLY INJURED IF HE WAS BEATEN AS BADLY AS YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY HE WAS…….ANOTHER QUESTION IF HE WAS HURT SO BADLY FROM BEING JUMPED BY 6 PEOPLE WHY WAS HE TREATED AND RELEASED FROM THE HOSPITAL THAT SAME DAY THEN SEEN OUT HAVING FUN ACTING LIKE HIS NORMAL SELF LATER ON THAT DAY????”

    First, witness testimony verifies that six kids jumped him, maybe they just weren’t very tough and didn’t beat him as bad as they possibly could have. But he did get beaten pretty badly.

    Second, nowhere does it say he was “acting like his normal self later on that day”. He suffered a concussion and his eye was swollen almost shut but he wanted to go the ring ceremony.

    “WHERE I’M FROM KIDS GET JUMPED ON BY GANGS OF PEOPLE AND SOMEIMES KILLED EVERYDAY BUT THEY DON’T LOOK AT FACING 22 YEARS IN PRISON…..DOESN’T MATTER HOW YOU SEE IT TO ME IT WAS STILL A FIGHT RATHER IT WAS ONE ON ONE OR NOT….IF YOUR TOWN BELIEVES IN SUCH HARSH PUNISHMENT FOR PEOPLE GETTING JUMPED BY MORE THAN ONE PERSON REGARDLESS OF RACE WHY WAS THE WHITE KIDS WHO BEAT UP THE ONE BLACK BOY AT THE PARTY NOT CONVICTED THIS WAY EVEN THOUGH IT DIN’T HAPPEN ON SHCOOL GROUNDS?????”

    That is a shame that where you are from people get jumped by gangs and sometimes killed everyday. I assume the people in Jena don’t want their town to be anything like that and I certainly don’t want mine to either. Maybe the gang beatings could be reduced in your town if harsher punishments were handed down. And no, a fight is not 6 on 1, a fight is 1 on 1 and no more. 6 on 1 is a beating and it is a pretty wimpy thing to do. It doesn’t paint the Jena 6 as tough guys that they wouldn’t man up and go 1 on 1.

    As for the last part of that comment, punishment is always more severe when things happen on school grounds (and should be). PLus thjey have a zero tolerance policy as stated.

  50. CommonSense says:

    “FIRST OF ALL ……WERE YOU THERE TO SEE THAT HE WAS PUNCHED FROM BEHIND AND THAT HE WAS STILL BEING ATTACKED AS HE LAY ON THE GROUND UNCONSCIOUS??? OR ARE YOU GETTING THIS FROM ARTICLES THAT YOU READ JUST AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE?”

    It doesn’t come from articles, it comes directly from WITNESS TESTIMONY.

    “I HONESTLY DON’T BELIEVE THAT SIX KIDS JUMPED ON THIS ONE STUDENT BECAUSE “IN MY OPINION” HE WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN KNOCKED UNCONSCIOUS HE WOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD OR SERIOUSLY INJURED IF HE WAS BEATEN AS BADLY AS YOU ARE TRYING TO SAY HE WAS…….ANOTHER QUESTION IF HE WAS HURT SO BADLY FROM BEING JUMPED BY 6 PEOPLE WHY WAS HE TREATED AND RELEASED FROM THE HOSPITAL THAT SAME DAY THEN SEEN OUT HAVING FUN ACTING LIKE HIS NORMAL SELF LATER ON THAT DAY????”

    Again, testimony says it was 6 kids. As for him being out “acting like his normal self later on that day”, no where does it say that. He had a concussion and his eye was nearly swollen shut. He went to the ring ceremony that evening but was certainly not “acting like his normal self”

    “WHERE I’M FROM KIDS GET JUMPED ON BY GANGS OF PEOPLE AND SOMEIMES KILLED EVERYDAY BUT THEY DON’T LOOK AT FACING 22 YEARS IN PRISON…..DOESN’T MATTER HOW YOU SEE IT TO ME IT WAS STILL A FIGHT RATHER IT WAS ONE ON ONE OR NOT”

    Where you’re from is not somewhere I want to be then. Maybe they should give harsher punishments for gang beatings and killings so that it doesn’t happen as much. Also, a fight is not 6 on 1, that is a bunch of wussies who can’t fight for themselves visciously beating one kid together. A fight is two people squaring up one on one to air out problems.

    “IF YOUR TOWN BELIEVES IN SUCH HARSH PUNISHMENT FOR PEOPLE GETTING JUMPED BY MORE THAN ONE PERSON REGARDLESS OF RACE WHY WAS THE WHITE KIDS WHO BEAT UP THE ONE BLACK BOY AT THE PARTY NOT CONVICTED THIS WAY EVEN THOUGH IT DIN’T HAPPEN ON SHCOOL GROUNDS??????”

    As is the case with most crimes, the punishment is much more severe when said crime occurs on school grounds. Also, From Jena has stated numerous times that the school has a zero tolerance policy for fighting on school grounds.

    You really need to look more deeply into the facts of this case before hoisting yourself up on the soapbox.

  51. CommonSense says:

    The last post was in response to WHERE IS THE JUSTICE????

  52. tiffany heard says:

    i am here again to respond to the lastest blog posted, and i know i am only hearing a one sided story but i’m goin to voice mu opinions once again. first of all i truly don’t believe that his past criminal records should even be an issue because i am a 21 yr old female and there are things i did when i was 19 that i wouldn’t dare do today!!! besides like a previous writer said that those particular charges coud have been blown completly out of proportion. this is ridiculous because regardless no one should have a 90k bail for a fight nor should anyone be facing a 22 yr sentence that is a bit extreme. if there are gonna be action taken against taken against these black boys then there should be action taken against all parties involved including the white kids, this is nothing but racism at it’s finest and nothing anyone can say or do to change that underlining fact.

  53. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    COMMON SENSE

    COMMON SENSE

    IT SEEMS YOU LIKE TO REPSOND ALOT ON PEOPLE’S OPINION AND AGAIN I WILL SAY I AM ENTITLED TO MINE AS WELL AS YOU ARE ENTITLE TO YOURS……YOU SAY THE INFORMATION CAME FROM EYE WITNESSES?????? YEAH EYE WITNESSES THAT COULD NOT IDENTIFY BELL AS BEING THE INITAL ATTACKER…….AND I HAVE READ SO MUCH ON THIS I CAN’T REMEBER EXACTLY WHERE I READ IT BUT IT DID SAY HE WAS OUT AT A FUNCTION AND APPEARED TO BE HIS NORMAL SELF……AND IF HE WAS SO BEATEN WHY EVEN BE OUT IN PUBLIC INSTEAD OF AT HOME RESTING????? IN ANOTHER ARTICLE I READ THAT JUSTIN GOT UP IN BELL’S FACE GIVING HIM THE FINGER AND THAT IS HOW IT STARTED SO WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT STORIES WHOSE TO SAY WHAT REALLY HAPPENED….

    Where you’re from is not somewhere I want to be then. Maybe they should give harsher punishments for gang beatings and killings so that it doesn’t happen as much. Also, a fight is not 6 on 1, that is a bunch of wussies who can’t fight for themselves visciously beating one kid together. A fight is two people squaring up one on one to air out problems.

    YOUR RIGHT AND WHERE YOUR FROM IS NOT SOMEWHERE I WOULD WANT TO BE. MAYBE THEY SHOULD GIVE HARSHER PUNISHMENTS HEAR BUT WHAT IS GOING ON HERE IS NOT IN QUESTION……IT’S THE WHERE YOU ARE IN JENA……I AM FULLY AWARE OF WHAT A FIGHT IS AND I GUESS THE WHITE KIDS WHO JUMPED ON THE BLACK KIDS WEREN’T “WUSSIES” (YOUR WORDS NOT MINE)?????? AND IF THE SHCOOL HAD ZERO TOLERANCE FOR FIGHTING WHY DID THE SUPERINTENDANT PLACE THE WHITE CHILDREN BACK IN SCHOOL AFTER THE PRINCIPAL EXPELLED THEM AND ONLY GAVE THEM 3 DAYS SUPENSION FOR HANGING THE NOOSES????

    SO HOW CAN I LOOK INTO FACTS WHEN NO ONE REALLY KNOWS THE FACTS BECAUSE EVERYBODY IS SAYING SOMETHING DIFFERENT…..CHECK YOURSELF…..

    OH AND SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN THE ENGLSIH PROFESSOR ON THIS SITE YOU SPELLED visciously WRONG…….THE CORRECT SPELLING IS viciously……..

  54. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    OH AND YES I KNOW I SPELLED A FEW WORDS WRONG BUT I HAVE NOT BEEN THE ONE TRYING TO CORRECT PEOPLE’S GRAMMAR……

  55. CommonSense says:

    WHERE IS THE JUSTICE????-
    I do not take issue with your having a different opinion than I do. I take issue with you backing up that opion with untrue/unreliable facts and sources.

    “YOU SAY THE INFORMATION CAME FROM EYE WITNESSES?????? YEAH EYE WITNESSES THAT COULD NOT IDENTIFY BELL AS BEING THE INITAL ATTACKER”

    Not all witnesses could identify him, but several did.

    “AND I HAVE READ SO MUCH ON THIS I CAN’T REMEBER EXACTLY WHERE I READ IT BUT IT DID SAY HE WAS OUT AT A FUNCTION AND APPEARED TO BE HIS NORMAL SELF……AND IF HE WAS SO BEATEN WHY EVEN BE OUT IN PUBLIC INSTEAD OF AT HOME RESTING????? IN ANOTHER ARTICLE I READ THAT JUSTIN GOT UP IN BELL’S FACE GIVING HIM THE FINGER AND THAT IS HOW IT STARTED SO WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT STORIES WHOSE TO SAY WHAT REALLY HAPPENED….”

    Show me the article where it says he was acting his “normal self” and I will discuss this further. He may have wanted to go out in public to prove a point that he wouldn’t let the beating stop him from living his normal life…I don’t know why he didn’t stay him, call him and ask him. Also, show me the article with the getting up in his face and giving him the finger part, because no one has ever mentioned that before. Some reports say he called him a n***** before the fight ensued. But again, not proven because Bell’s defense team call NO WITNESSES to testify to this. I would take witness testimony over the biased articles you are reading though.

    “YOUR RIGHT AND WHERE YOUR FROM IS NOT SOMEWHERE I WOULD WANT TO BE. MAYBE THEY SHOULD GIVE HARSHER PUNISHMENTS HEAR BUT WHAT IS GOING ON HERE IS NOT IN QUESTION……IT’S THE WHERE YOU ARE IN JENA……I AM FULLY AWARE OF WHAT A FIGHT IS AND I GUESS THE WHITE KIDS WHO JUMPED ON THE BLACK KIDS WEREN’T “WUSSIES” (YOUR WORDS NOT MINE)?????? ”

    I never said I was in Jena, what I did say was that maybe Jena is doing this to show that they don’t tolerate gang beatings like some others do. The fight where “the white kids who jumped on the black kids” can’t be compared. A complaint was only filed against of of the white kids who plead guilty to simply battery. If they all jumped in during that fight, then yes they were wussies. But the victim only chose to file charges on one of them and the fact that it was a gang beating was never confirmed.

    “AND IF THE SHCOOL HAD ZERO TOLERANCE FOR FIGHTING WHY DID THE SUPERINTENDANT PLACE THE WHITE CHILDREN BACK IN SCHOOL AFTER THE PRINCIPAL EXPELLED THEM AND ONLY GAVE THEM 3 DAYS SUPENSION FOR HANGING THE NOOSES????”

    I think everyone in here agress the kids who hung the nooses should have been expelled or at least punished more severely. However, last time I checked, hanging nooses and fighting were two different things. The school’s zero tolerance policy refers to fighting in school.

    Again, it is tough to debate this issue when people are so blinded by there opions. While no one knows all of the facts, we at least know some things to be true. You seem to be disregarding these truths, possibly because you are blinded by your own opinions. I hope you will begin to look more closely at this and actually be able to debate the facts of the incident. I would rather disagree with someone making valid points than with someone without a clear understanding of the events in Jena.

  56. From Jena says:

    WHERE IS THE JUSTICE:

    WHERE IS THE CAPS LOCK KEY?!?!?!?

    Jeez

  57. CommonSense says:

    “YEAH EYE WITNESSES THAT COULD NOT IDENTIFY BELL AS BEING THE INITAL ATTACKER”

    Actually, several could identify him as the attacker.

    “AND I HAVE READ SO MUCH ON THIS I CAN’T REMEBER EXACTLY WHERE I READ IT BUT IT DID SAY HE WAS OUT AT A FUNCTION AND APPEARED TO BE HIS NORMAL SELF……AND IF HE WAS SO BEATEN WHY EVEN BE OUT IN PUBLIC INSTEAD OF AT HOME RESTING?????”

    Can you forward me the article/site where you read this? I would guess it was one of the “Free the Jena 6″ sites that skews the info in favor of the kids who committed the crime. He may been there to show that he wouldn’t let it stop him, I don’t know why he wasn’t home, you could call and ask him.

    “IN ANOTHER ARTICLE I READ THAT JUSTIN GOT UP IN BELL’S FACE GIVING HIM THE FINGER AND THAT IS HOW IT STARTED SO WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT STORIES WHOSE TO SAY WHAT REALLY HAPPENED….”

    Do you read articles written by Mychal Bell’s family or something? No of this has been validated through any testimony. And the giving him the finger has never even been presented. The actually rumor is that Justin muttered n***** under his breath or that he ridiculed Bell for getting beaten up at the barn. If he did, that is absolutely wrong. But again, there is no solid evidence that he said anything.

    “YOUR RIGHT AND WHERE YOUR FROM IS NOT SOMEWHERE I WOULD WANT TO BE. MAYBE THEY SHOULD GIVE HARSHER PUNISHMENTS HEAR BUT WHAT IS GOING ON HERE IS NOT IN QUESTION……IT’S THE WHERE YOU ARE IN JENA……”

    First, I am not/never said I was in Jena. The point I was trying to make is that towns like Jena probably don’t want to be like where you are from. They do not want gang violence to occur and they are willing to punish someone to avoid that happening. I would feel the same way if it were my town.

    “I AM FULLY AWARE OF WHAT A FIGHT IS AND I GUESS THE WHITE KIDS WHO JUMPED ON THE BLACK KIDS WEREN’T “WUSSIES” (YOUR WORDS NOT MINE)?????? ”

    I never said the white kids weren’t wussies. What happened at the barn was never proven to be a gang beating. Files were only charged against one kid who pled guilty to simply battery. Again, get the facts straight please. If it were a gang beating at the barn, then yes, the white kids were p******!

    “AND IF THE SHCOOL HAD ZERO TOLERANCE FOR FIGHTING WHY DID THE SUPERINTENDANT PLACE THE WHITE CHILDREN BACK IN SCHOOL AFTER THE PRINCIPAL EXPELLED THEM AND ONLY GAVE THEM 3 DAYS SUPENSION FOR HANGING THE NOOSES????”

    I think everyone in here agrees that the punishment for the noose incident should have been much harsher. However, fighting and hanging a noose are two totally different things. A zero tolerance policy for fighting means just that “we will not tolerate fight”. They should have had a no tolerance policy for hanging nooses but didn’t.

    I was never attacking your opinions, just the fact that your opions are in no way based on facts but rather on biased articles/reports/websites. It is clear that you are not getting all the information that is available and I wish you would have access to it so we could have a valid debate regarding this incident. Let me know if you want links to any articles from accredited news sources regarding this incident.

  58. CommonSense says:

    Sorry, again posted in reponse to WHERE IS THE JUSTICE????

  59. From Jena says:

    WHERE IS THE JUSTICE:

    You are reading articles. Wait until you read eye witness statements. They are the true accounts. Articles are spinning this story with complete inaccuracies and LIES. I can pull one out of almost every article I’ve read. Go ahead…point me to one.

  60. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! says:

    Common Sense:

    I would like to know the links where you’re getting your information from. Who can truely say the media is telling the correct story…. once again the only ones who truely know what happened are those who was actually there.

    Please provide the links so I can look on there myself.

    Thanks!!

  61. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    COMMON SENSE

    I AM NOT GOING TO GO BACK AND FORTH WITH YOU ABOUT THIS ISSUE…….YOU CAN SAY WHAT YOU WANT…..AND BELL WASN’T EVEN THE ONE WHO GOT BEAT UP AT THE ALL WHITE PARTY IT WAS ROBERT BAILEY…….SO GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT…..I DON’T NEED TO POINT OUT WHAT I READ AND WHERE I READ IT AT…..THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THAT RACISM IS PLAYING A MAJOR PART IN THIS AND THESE BOYS ARE BEING TOO HARSHLY PUNISHED…..

    OH AND THE ARTICLE DID SAY THAT THE BLACK BOY WAS PUNCHED IN THE FACE AS SOON AS HE ENTERED THE PARTY THEN KICKED AND STOMPED AND SOMEONE POURED BEER ON HIM……..MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO A GOOGLE SEARCH ON JENA6.COM AND READ ALL THAT I HAVE READ……HOPE YOU HAVE A BLESSED DAY!!!!

  62. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    JENA,

    YEAH THAT’S ALL I CAN READ IS ARTICLE’S AND IN THOSE ARTICLE’S IT HAS WITNESS STATEMENTS THAT HAVE ALSO APPEARED TO BE LIES…JEEZ!!! JENA YOU EXPRESS YOUR FEELINGS ONE WAY AND I WILL EXPRESS MINE MY WAY…….

  63. From Jena says:

    WHERE IS THE JUSTICE:

    I have a friend that has read the eye witness statement, and I look to read them in the next couple of weeks.

    Your accounts of the Fair Barn incident are not represented at all in anyone’s eye witness statement, incluidng Robert Bailey’s. He wrote a vivid description of what happened that night, but failed to mention anything about a beer bottle.

    He claimed he got cracked over the head with a beer bottles SEVERAL MONTHS after that incident occurred, and when this case got media attention. No medical report was filed.

    …very strange indeed…

  64. CommonSense says:

    “AND BELL WASN’T EVEN THE ONE WHO GOT BEAT UP AT THE ALL WHITE PARTY IT WAS ROBERT BAILEY”

    You are correct, I meant to say Bell and his friends, i apologize for the clerical error.

    “OH AND THE ARTICLE DID SAY THAT THE BLACK BOY WAS PUNCHED IN THE FACE AS SOON AS HE ENTERED THE PARTY THEN KICKED AND STOMPED AND SOMEONE POURED BEER ON HIM”

    Again, what article???

    “MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO A GOOGLE SEARCH ON JENA6.COM AND READ ALL THAT I HAVE READ”

    I have done a google search. The majority of the articles that come up, outside of the wikipedia article and the chicago tribune article, are from sights such as Democracy Now! and Free the Jena 6! Case and point, you are reading biased articles written from the perspective of people who share your views.

  65. CommonSense says:

    THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!

    NPR’s (national public radio) website has a lot of unbiased articles on their site if you search for Jena 6. Also, go to newsweek.com and type in Jena 6. While the article laura posted on here had a moderately biased stance in favor of the Jena 6, they have a slew of good, fact-based articles. Accredited news agencies such as these provide a clearer picture of this case then the websites that pop up during a google search.

  66. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    COMMON SENSE AND JENA

    THIS CAME FROM NEWS WEEK:
    A day earlier Barker had testified that he was struck from behind and immediately went unconscious; there was conflicting testimony from witnesses as to whether the initial attacker was Bell and whether that attacker was wearing a green hooded jacket or a red shirt.

    GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE YOU TRY TO COMMENT ON MINE.

  67. CommonSense says:

    “A day earlier Barker had testified that he was struck from behind and immediately went unconscious; there was conflicting testimony from witnesses as to whether the initial attacker was Bell and whether that attacker was wearing a green hooded jacket or a red shirt.”

    I never claimed that he was definately the initial attacker. All i said was that several of the witnesses did identify Bell as the initial attacker. There is no evidenced that anyone identified anyone else other than Bell as the one who started the fight though. The ones who didn’t identify him seemed unclear who the one who threw the first punch was. I was not there so I don’t know for sure if he was. That is not why he is the trouble he is in. He is in this trouble because of his participation in this fight and his prior record. I admitted that I made a clerical error and meant to write “made fun of bell and the others for the beating at the barn”, but my facts beyond that are straight. Keep reading newsweek though, I am glad I led you in the right direction and you may actually gain a better understanding of this issue in the future.

  68. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    JENA
    HOW CAN YOU PULL A LIE FROM EACH ARTICLE AND PROVE IT TO BE A LIE?????? AGAIN I ASK WHERE YOU THERE???? IF NOT THEN YOU NOR ANYONE ELSE WHO WASN’T PHYSICALLY PRESENT CAN SAY WHAT IS THE TRUTH AND WHAT IS A LIE……..REGARDLESS OF WITNESS STATEMENT OR WHAT…..

  69. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    COMMON SENSE

    IT IS ALL MISLEADING NO MATTER WERE YOU READ IT AT….I DON’T NEED TO GAIN A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT’S GOING ON…IT’S WRONG, IT’S WRONG, IT’S WRONG FOR THESE 6 BOYS TO BE PUNISHED THE WAY THEY ARE TRYING TO PUNISH THEM AND THAT WAS MY POINT FROM THE BEGINNING…..LIKE I TOLD JENA YOU EXPRESS YOUR FEELINGS ONE WAY AND I WILL EXPRESS MINE MY WAY….

  70. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    COMMON SENSE
    OH AND OF COURSE HIS PRIOR RECORD IS GOING TO BE BROUGHT UP NOW BECAUSE IT HAS SIMILAR CHARGES LIKE THE ONES BEING BROUGHT AGAINST HIM NOW……IF HIS PREVIOUS CHARGES WAS NOT RELATED TO WHAT IS GOING ON NOW HIS RECORD PROBABLY NEVER WOULD HAVE BEEN MENTIONED.

  71. Laura says:

    Where is the justice – LAY OFF THE FREAKING ALL CAPS COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  72. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    LAURA SWEETIE YOU TYPE THE WAY YOU TYPE AND I WILL TYPE THE WAY I TYPE……MY KEYBOARD IS SET IN ALL CAPS AND I DON’T CARE TO KEEP CHANGING IT JUST TO RESPOND TO PEOPLE ON THIS WEBSITE…..I’M NOT YELLING AT ANYONE (I KNOW THAT IS WHAT PEOPLE TEND TO TAKE ALL CAPS AS) I JUST DON’T FEEL LIKE CHANGING BACK AND FORTH.

  73. Laura says:

    I’m about to ban you just for the “sweetie.” I’m serious – knock it off or you won’t be posting here at all. Not only is it hard to read, it’s unbelievably annoying.

  74. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE SMART ABOUT IT AND IF YOU WANT TO BAND ME FINE DON’T HAVE TIME TO DEBATE BACK AND FORTH ABOUT MY OPINION’S ANYWAY……..HOW CAN YOU TELL SOMEONE NOT TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS…..YOU DON’T HAVE TO BAND ME I WILL BAND MYSELF.

  75. From Jena says:

    WHERE IS THE JUSTICE:

    Again, you are going off articles in magazines and papers.

    You are not going off eye witness statements and public documents.

  76. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! says:

    Jena:

    Where can we find the eye witness statements and public documents??? I would really like to see it.

  77. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE??? says:

    Jena,
    Yes please tell us where to find them.

  78. From Jena says:

    They’ll be online in a couple of weeks (or less).

    When they are released, I’ll point you both to them.

  79. Troy says:

    I live in Virginia, and this is the first I have heard of this. My co-workers and I spoke about it today and none of us were aware of this incident. I have read all of your previous posts and I still don’t understand something. It is mentioned several times the school has a “STRICT NO FIGHTING POLICY”, how is that even relevant in a criminal case the school system in the state I live in has no power to apply criminal punishment, only suspen/expell children for behavior. Either way past criminal acts should be a part of sentencing a person, but 22 years for a school fight and yes whether it is 6 on 1 or 1 on 1 a fight is a fight. The only way to go about this is logically, there was an incident where a person was beat and the accused recieved 3 days of suspension, you therefore have precidence on a case and the same guidelines should be enforced, whether they are white or black or whatever. The simple fact that racism is previlent in the town should have allowed for a change of venue.

  80. From Jena 2 says:

    Troy:

    “It is mentioned several times the school has a “STRICT NO FIGHTING POLICY”, how is that even relevant in a criminal case the school system in the state I live in has no power to apply criminal punishment, only suspen/expell children for behavior. Either way past criminal acts should be a part of sentencing a person, but 22 years for a school fight and yes whether it is 6 on 1 or 1 on 1 a fight is a fight”

    Are you saying that if 6 people jump beat somebody unconscious at school the worst punishment they can get is suspension/ expullsion but if they do the same thing at Wal-Mart, church parking lot, an alley somewhere, etc they should be charged? How is being on school property a safety net?

  81. From Jena 2 says:

    “WERE YOU THERE TO SEE THAT HE WAS PUNCHED FROM BEHIND AND THAT HE WAS STILL BEING ATTACKED AS HE LAY ON THE GROUND UNCONSCIOUS??? OR ARE YOU GETTING THIS FROM ARTICLES THAT YOU READ JUST AS WELL AS EVERYBODY ELSE?”

    It’s not from articles. It’s from about 40 eye witness statements.

    [The eyewitnesses statements as reported are contradictory. Until I see them myself, and unless they're in total agreement on this point, I'm going to start deleting or editing comments that assert this. Aside from the reporting, I know from experience that you will never have 40 identical statements. It's impossible, unless people have been coached. - Laura]

  82. James Black says:

    THIS IS AN OUTRAGE

    I just saw where you got your info, “michael david murphy” no wonder you are so screwed up. Go back to that page I know at some point I told the facts just as I have on here. There are just to many thick headed people who dont want to believe the truth. In fact I think I will quit wasting my time. At least i think Laura opened here eyes a little and thats all that matters because some of you are blinded by ignorance. By that I dont mean stupid, I mean ignorant of the facts. COMMON SENSE, JENA, and JENA 2 you might as well quit arguing we know the truth and all your efforts are falling on deaf ears. Heck most of these people believe OJ is innocent.

    ["At least i think Laura opened here eyes a little and thats all that matters because some of you are blinded by ignorance." Better watch it there, James. Insulting people doesn't do your side any good. I was never blinded by ignorance, I wrote what I wrote because of the available facts at the time; that is not being "blinded." And I give everyone else the benefit of the doubt and assume they did as well. I'm willing to take a look at new information, and I believe others will as well. But there are some facts that are so well established that they are beyond debate. Such as:

    1. There is a real problem with racism in Jena. This is according to a white pastor who's other writings are conservative, a black school board member, two black teachers, DOZENS of comments on the Town Talk and this and other websites, and several outright admissions from people from Jena on this website.

    2. Justin Barker's injuries were minor, and the Louisiana Supremes have already vacated a similar verdict in a similar case simply because those injuries were not severe. I've had an offer to see the photos but what you don't seem to get is that the photos are completely irrelevant. They're a tool to generate outrage and drive emotions. Which is why Walters used them, instead of actual medical testimony establishing Barkers "serious" injuries. According to you guys, 6 ATHLETES kicked and stomped Barker - yet there are not facial fractures, broken nose, broken teeth, long term injuries/disfiguration, renal injuries, broken ribs... just a couple of weeks worth of swelling and the assertion that he had "headaches" for a while, for which doctors could find no medical reason.

    3. I'm willing to concede the possibility that the beating may have been planned, but there is NO WAY that this was a planned attempted murder, and sneakers are NOT weapons. If there have been other cases where that has been established, they should be overturned. It's a stupid concept.

    4. The noose hangers, with whom Barker is friends, were not punished in any meaningful way for what even the FBI said met the criteria of a hate crime. I have not emphasized this because I think that the concept of hate crimes is stupid - punishing someone for what they think instead of primarily for what they DO. However, any reasonable and rational person will concede that the nooses were a threat, and that threat should have been handled appropriately - namely permanent expulsion from school, and an assembly reassuring the black students that the problem was being taken seriously. From Jena has suggested that nooses were hanged on a regular basis from the tree, and admitted that it's only gossip and she has no proof. My two cents on that - there is NO POSSIBLE WAY that nooses were hanged from that tree on a regular basis, as evidenced by the wry comments of the two black teachers along the lines of, "Well, one for me, one for you, who gets the third one?"

    There are a few more but I have to get to church. (Since Katrina destroyed my church building, the church body meets on Saturdays in another church's building.)]

  83. From Jena says:

    Laura:

    “From Jena has suggested that nooses were hanged on a regular basis from the tree, and admitted that it’s only gossip and she has no proof”

    JEEZ!! What do I have to say to prove to you that I’m a GUY??? That’s the third damn time somebody’s gotten my gender wrong.

    FROM JENA IS A GUY!

  84. From Jena says:

    James Black:

    I don’t care what they say and how many times they say it, I’m not gonna give up. I want to be here when the tides are turned.

    Honestly? We’re fighting an uphill battle because so many twisted facts were sprayed around that it looks VERY suspicious in Jena. If I weren’t from here, I’d feel the same way. It’s sad how this has all taken place…

    But I’m gonna fight until it’s over. I mentioned in one of my first postings in here that I will fight everyone in these chat rooms until computers freeze up if I have to. I believe the truth should be brought out about our town and I don’t care if I change one person at a time.

  85. James Black says:

    From Jena
    Keep up the good work, but I am tired of the truth falling on deaf ears. For the record as for as I know no other nooses were ever hung from that tree. There were nooses hung in the pecan tree infront of the canteen. I don think it is still there since they built the new band room. The nooses were hung with tigers hanging from them and bears(stuffed LOL dont wont PETA on us). Sometimes the them would be HANG EM HIGH followed by go giants.I even remember a manaquin dressed as a REBEL before a Pineville game, being hung there. I am probably several years older. I do know one of the noose hangers father was in highschool at that time. I am not saying this was what was going on with these nooses. Any way, good luck and if I find out any more, absolute facts I will let you know. I just saw on CNN where a school cop in Houston alledgedly was handing out ebonics dictionarys. Maybe those from there ,that are protesting this will look at their own community.

  86. Jack Black says:

    It’s Sunday morning around 10:15 am Central Time. Today was my 1st exposure to the “Jena 6” in any way, shape, or form. I have looked at a short video from something called “Collateral Unfiltered News” on YouTube; I watched a clip from NBC News, also copied on YouTube and I have read all 83 posts (83 as I started typing) that are on this thread. I realize that this thread is incomplete in the sense that people are posting comments on this thread that are relevant or in response to another thread. But in reading these threads, I have come to my own opinions. I am not expressing them because I want more facts. So if you can, on either side of the table, help me with the following:

    Did only one kid get arrested or charged in the “barn fight” when the black kid was attacked or are there more.?
    Did anyone find out why a black kid came to an all white party in a time of “unrest” (for lack of a better word)?
    Did the white kid at the gas station who pulled the gun ever get arrested or charged with anything?
    What happened to the 3 kids who took the gun from this white kid? Also did anyone ask why this kid had the gun in the 1st place? (He surely did not have a license to own a gun did he; especially if he was high school age.)
    How does the school board overturn a principal’s decision on a matter like this and not expect a public response?
    Are 5 of the 6 kids being held and trialed as adults? (Or is it tried; there are quite a few English majors on this thread apparently)
    Why didn’t anyone come to the defense of Barker when he was jumped? Is it possible that even the white people that saw it felt it was justified?
    I saw a picture of the Defense Attorney, Bell should have known he was in trouble just by the hair alone (sorry, not a question).
    And last for now: If there is no racism, why is there (or was there) a “white kids tree”? And why cut it down now (out of sight, out of mind OR leave the past behind and lets move on).

    Please answer, especially the people who are from Jena.

  87. Charla says:

    Jack Black

    It has been over a week the last time I checked this blog, so everyone please bear with me. I could try to answer most of your questions, however there seems to be enough Jena “experts” (or at least enough people that know what they claim to be “actual facts” regarding the whole situation) that will willingly dispute what I say. Everyone is looking at this from a racial standpoint-justifiably so I might add. What I would like these bloggers to do is take the race factor OUT OF THE EQUATION for just a moment and think about what is happening from a judicial point of view. Any way you look at it this is a textbook case of SELECTIVE PROSECUTION, no questions asked. The only way ANYONE can convince me differently is if someone can supply FACTUAL EVIDENCE supporting the following:

    1. EVERYONE IN JENA THAT PARTICIPATES IN A FIGHT GETS THE SAME CHARGES AS THE JENA 6. I doubt this very seriously. A fight is a fight, period. Whether you are on school grounds or not, applicable charges are applied, so please do not insist that for some reason this was a more serious offense because it happened on school grounds. If everyone involved in physical altercations received this outrageous charge, then the white kid who was charged with simple battery after fighting with Bailey (I still say he was jumped by more than one person) would be serving a one-year sentence as well instead of having a simple battery charge. Oh, I forgot, maybe because he didn’t kick Bailey with the oh-so-dangerous weapon (his tennis shoes), at least not that we know of. I know this is not the only fight ever to occur at Jena High; were all the people in previous fights arrested and charged as well to this degree? Or were they given the more appropriate punishment of expulsion or suspension? If you can dig up ANY INSTANCES that indicate it is normal practice in Jena to charge/arrest those who participate in fights on school grounds I’d appreciate it.

    2. LEGALLY, YOU CAN RETRIEVE A WEAPON FROM YOUR VEHICLE IF YOU FEEL THREATENED IN PUBLIC FOR WHATEVER REASON. I will stipulate that my information on this matter has come from this site or links posted on this site at some point or another (probably back in late June or early July). The only accounts I have about what happened at that store is from what I read, which was more than 10 articles from various online news agencies (Newsweek for sure, I remember that one). So if anyone knows more accurate details, please feel free to enlighten us all. If I remember right the three black boys were charged with theft and something else ridiculous in this incident, for wrestling the gun away from the white kid who pulled the gun on THEM. I will admit, I have tried to side with the white kid on this, but his story just doesn’t make any sense to me (or did I get the story wrong?). If the three black kids did something so serious where he felt threatened enough to go to his vehicle and retrieve his gun, one of two things would have happened: either he would have never made it to his vehicle at all, or he would have gotten in his truck and LEFT THE STORE instead of retrieving a weapon from his vehicle, then EXITING the vehicle after he was safely inside. Either way it goes, he cannot legally argue that he pulled the gun from the vehicle for protection from the three black kids (keep in mind, although no actual fight had taken place, even if one had the law does allow us to “escalate” a fight with a weapon, it is a definite charge). What were the three black boys doing when he went to his vehicle, waiting to see what he was going to do? The black boys were so intent on doing him bodily harm that they wrestled the gun away from him and ran? This makes absolutely no sense to me. In any event, no charges were filed in that case against the alleged “victim” in this horrible “robbery” of a weapon he had no business having in his vehicle in the first place. Is Walter Reed more concerned with how people use their tennis shoes for weapons, rather than a gun?

    Let me be perfectly clear on this: I am not one of those people who are proclaiming the Jena 6 were totally innocent and should be let off the hook. If you do the crime, you should do the time. My thing is, we should start looking at this for what it really is: a gross abuse of power by a DA who openly threatened an assembly of kids and had the nerve to make good on his promises. It’s sickening; I can’t imagine anyone justifying what he said that day, and the subsequent actions he has taken since. Anyone who is a parent for sure should have a serious problem with this; we send our kids to school to learn, the last thing we’d expect is for someone who is responsible for maintaining law and order in our community, a supposed leader, to call an assembly at school to inform your kids he could end his life if he so pleases.

    Again, since there seems to be so many of us chatting that know the facts, please share them with the rest of us. I am not interested in being stuck on stupid, so if you can prove or give any valid information (please supply links) about any of the above please do so. No offense to everyone’s opinions, but it is hard to form a justifiable conclusion about any situation without stone cold facts. I’ve read many different accounts of what is REALLY going on from the blogs above; if you could supply some links so we can all see where you get your information it would be extremely helpful.

  88. Charla says:

    From Jena: “Your accounts of the Fair Barn incident are not represented at all in anyone’s eye witness statement, incluidng Robert Bailey’s. He wrote a vivid description of what happened that night, but failed to mention anything about a beer bottle.”

    Where did you see that writing? Can you provide us with a link/document of this vivid description? I’ve never heard of it, please post it for us. Either way, he was obviously assaulted/got into a fight with at least one person, otherwise there would not have been simple battery charges filed at all. Also, keep in mind that just because someone submits an eyewitness account does not make what they recall a FACT; it has been proven all too many times that-though our justice system relys on it heavily-eyewitness testimony is often inconsistent or incorrect. I’m not implying that people purposely lie under oath; I’m only indicating that what we think happened and what actually did happen are often two different things. Everyone is so quick to believe eyewitness testimony of Justin Barker’s beating (many of which are very conflicting, from what I’ve read) and refuse to believe Bailey’s assertion that he was attacked by more than one person. After all, he was the victim in that attack; if Justin knows he was attacked by more than one person, surely Bailey should know if he felt just 2 fists hitting him, or 4, or more. I don’t get it……

    Do you (or anyone else for that matter) have more information about the previous “4 violent acts” that Bell commmited in the past? I am not trying to prematurely downplay his criminal record. All I am saying is that we cannot assume that these “violent acts” involved his purposeful intent to cause bodily harm to someone on a homicidal level, as one could be led to believe. You could throw a cup of ice at someone and be charged with assualt, let alone battery. Any details about what happened on these four occasions?

    Common Sense: I understand your disdain in having one person being beaten by six. However, current law does not allow a more severe sentence for this happening; there is no distinction between a fight that’s six-on-one and a fight that is one-on-one (though I firmly believe it should), especially not an incident deemed a high school fight. With that said, we cannot use these six youths as examples of what should be. Our democratic process involves us writing our local congressmen to get the laws changed first, then implementing them accordingly. Until that happens, we cannot sentence someone in excess of what the law allows.

  89. From Jena says:

    Jack Black:

    First off, thank you for not jumping to conclusion like most people have done about this. I’ll answer your questions below:

    “Did only one kid get arrested or charged in the “barn fight” when the black kid was attacked or are there more.?”

    One white male got arrested. He’s about 22 y.o. He pled guilty to simply battery. I have a copy of the eye witness statement of Robert Bailey (the Jena 6 attacker who was involved with just about every incident in question) for that incident. He says himself that only two guys punched him, unlike what alot of the media is reporting (five on one). So even from HIS side of the story, only two guys punched him. And no, he has no mentioning of a beer bottle in his statement. I find that awfully strange.

    “Did anyone find out why a black kid came to an all white party in a time of “unrest” (for lack of a better word)?”

    He showed up with several of his friends. This party had several guys in it who hung out with the same click as the noose-hangers. The party was invitation-only. It wasn’t necessarily an all-white party. There may have been some black people there, but Robert Bailey and his friends were not invited. So one can only speculate why they showed up. Of course, I’m of the opinion that they were there to start trouble. Why else would the show up like that?

    “Did the white kid at the gas station who pulled the gun ever get arrested or charged with anything?”

    I’m not sure about this. I’ll have to look some things up. I BELIEVE he was arrested but they haven’t sentenced him or anything. But definitely don’t quote me on that. I know the three black students got arrested, most likely because they followed him to his vehicle and were beating him while he was trying to pull out the gun (that’s according to an eye witness statement). So they were considered the attackers, according to the eye witness.

    “What happened to the 3 kids who took the gun from this white kid? Also did anyone ask why this kid had the gun in the 1st place? (He surely did not have a license to own a gun did he; especially if he was high school age.)”

    I answered some of this question above. Almost everybody in Jena hunts and you’ll find a gun in probably 90% of vehicle driven by guys. That’s just a known fact here. I’m not sure if he actually had a license to carry it. If he didn’t, I’m sure our police department fined him for it.

    “How does the school board overturn a principal’s decision on a matter like this and not expect a public response?”

    I don’t know. Most people in Jena (including the white people) feel like expulsion was necessary. Many people say that it was just a joke and they meant no harm by it. I find it a little hard to believe, being that they are rednecks. But nobody knows what was going through their head but them.

    “Are 5 of the 6 kids being held and trialed as adults? (Or is it tried; there are quite a few English majors on this thread apparently)”

    One of the six is being treated as a juvenile. In fact, he’s playing on the football team right now. The others are being tried as adults.

    And don’t worry about me, I won’t judge you unless I can’t understand what you’re saying. lol

    “Why didn’t anyone come to the defense of Barker when he was jumped? Is it possible that even the white people that saw it felt it was justified?”

    One reason is because several of the attackers (Jena 6) friends held doors open to the gym where most of the people who could help were. Second, someone DID jump over Justin Barker and cover his body up to protect him. I suspect that’s one reason why he didn’t get severely injured. This was all put in eye witness statements.

    “And last for now: If there is no racism, why is there (or was there) a “white kids tree”?”

    I haven’t spoke with anyone in the black community about this, but I have never ONCE heard this tree be called the white tree. It’s in the exact middle of the square (where students hang out at recess). When I was in high school, blacks and whites hung out there. I’ve also heard from recent JHS graduates that black students hung out there even recently. So it’s completely inappropriate (at least in my eyes) to call it the “white tree”.

    “And why cut it down now (out of sight, out of mind OR leave the past behind and lets move on).”

    Remember that the school was burnt down. They cut this tree down because part of the new building will be where it was. So they had to cut it down for construction.

    If you have any more burning questions, just ask.

  90. James Black says:

    You dont have to have a license to carry a gun in your vehicle. You do have to have a license to carry a concealed weapon on your person. The gun wasnt loaded and there fore no violation. He retrieved it as self defense after being attacked as he went into the store. Witnesses said the black guys were leaving the store and saw the white guy and yelled we got action, then the white guy started running to his truck as they jumped him . He got to the truck and pulled the gun and they wrestled it away from him and took it with them as they ran off. They also punched his girfriend in the face. If you dont believe this you can ask the store owner who is neither black nor white. He wasnt arreested becuse of the witness accounts. He was the one who called the law after the attack,. If is had happened as the media led one to believe the blacks would have called the law not him. They later found the gun in the back of a car at one of their residents. It is correct that 90% of people in north louisiana have a gun in their vehicle and it is legal, unless you are a felon or on probation. I suspect with all of this going on that percent will be higher. In fact there is no vehicle I own that doesnt have at least one. they are there not because I would expect to need them around here but I travel through New Orleans and Houston at late hours of the night. I wouldnt dare drive in these area without protection. You know there is a murder every other day in New Orleans right now.

  91. From Jena says:

    Charla:

    (takes deep breath)

    “there seems to be enough Jena “experts” (or at least enough people that know what they claim to be “actual facts” regarding the whole situation) that will willingly dispute what I say”

    I don’t profess to be an expert. But 3 or 4 of us are FROM Jena. We see things you aren’t seeing, plain and simple.

    I don’t proclaim ANY actual facts until they are proven without a shadow of a doubt. I just take eye witness statements seriously, as they are the best thing to go on without a video tape of what happened. Do you agree with me on this?

    “A fight is a fight, period.”

    For the millionth time, IT WAS NOT A FIGHT! The boy never had a chance to defend himself. He was knocked in the head from behind, hit concrete, and landed on the ground unconscious. He then was kicked and punched by the Jena 6. This is, of course, according to MOST of the eye witness statements (not all). So you can take that for whatever you want. But either way, THAT IS NOT A FIGHT! A fight involves one side being conscious, whereas this guy wasn’t. Why do you think it’s a fight? Explain that to me.

    “the white kid who was charged with simple battery after fighting with Bailey (I still say he was jumped by more than one person) would be serving a one-year sentence as well instead of having a simple battery charge”

    Again, very different situations. According to Robert Bailey’s statement, he was punched by only two guys that night. He was conscious. He was able to defend himself. He also says that other white boys came after his two friends, who were black. This is Robert Bailey’s version of the story. I don’t have copies of the other statements yet. So EVEN FROM ROBERT BAILEY’S side, it was 3 or 4 on 3.

    “I know this is not the only fight ever to occur at Jena High; were all the people in previous fights arrested and charged as well to this degree?”

    Jena High School has a zero tolerance policy. Several people have been arrested since they initiated that policy but no one has been charged to this degree. Then again, this is the first time 6 have ganged up on one while he was unconscious. So DA Reed Walters decided to SELECTIVELY PROSECUTE these individuals (most likely) because of the circumstances. Can you sit here and tell me this was just a “typical fight”?

    “If you can dig up ANY INSTANCES that indicate it is normal practice in Jena to charge/arrest those who participate in fights on school grounds I’d appreciate it.”

    Come gather that yourself. I have no way of obtaining that information unless I visit the school. It’s unlikely that charges have been pressed for any of the high school FIGHTS before this BEATING.

    “I have tried to side with the white kid on this, but his story just doesn’t make any sense to me (or did I get the story wrong?)”

    His story does make sense, and one of the eye witness’ statements match his story alot closer than Robert Bailey’s. The eye witness says that she saw the white student running towards his truck with the 3 black students running after him. She said Robert Bailey, Theo Shaw, and (another black student not yet mentioned) jumped on him and started hitting and kicking him. They wrestled his gun away from him (it says the gun wasn’t loaded). She called and reported the fight. A man pulled up to the store and the three black students ran off.

    “Walter Reed”

    It’s Reed Walters. How many articles did you say you read?

    “My thing is, we should start looking at this for what it really is: a gross abuse of power by a DA who openly threatened an assembly of kids and had the nerve to make good on his promises.”

    If anything he did was illegal, he should be called on it and punished. No one has done that yet, though. After everything that was going on in town, I can understand why he was so upset. What he said was a little harsh. I wouldn’t have said what he said, I can assure you. But he said it, and you’re right, he made good on his promise.

    “Again, since there seems to be so many of us chatting that know the facts, please share them with the rest of us. ”

    More documents will be released in the next few weeks. Be patient.

    Also, go to the Alexandria Town Talk article. This link is an article describing what Donald Washington said in a meeting with people in Jena. He and two others conducted an investigation. He and Carmelita Freeman are black, the other is white. Two are from the FBI, one is from the Justice Department. They address many issues in this case. Laura seems to take issue with Donald Washington for his failure to see certain legal issues surrounding the “selective prosecution” argument, but keep in mind he and TWO OTHERS came into Jena and investigated. They discuss all of these incidents in the link below:

    http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070731/NEWS01/707310322

    They pretty much confirm what us Jena people have known from the start.

    “From Jena: “Your accounts of the Fair Barn incident are not represented at all in anyone’s eye witness statement, incluidng Robert Bailey’s. He wrote a vivid description of what happened that night, but failed to mention anything about a beer bottle.”

    Where did you see that writing? Can you provide us with a link/document of this vivid description? I’ve never heard of it, please post it for us”

    Hold your britches. I have the eye witness statements, and they will be online in the next two weeks, I strongly suspect.

    “Also, keep in mind that just because someone submits an eyewitness account does not make what they recall a FACT; it has been proven all too many times that-though our justice system relys on it heavily-eyewitness testimony is often inconsistent or incorrect. I’m not implying that people purposely lie under oath; I’m only indicating that what we think happened and what actually did happen are often two different things.”

    I emphatically agree with you there. But, what else do we have to go on?

    “if Justin knows he was attacked by more than one person”

    Justin Barker had NO CLUE what was going on, Charla, because he was UNCONSCIOUS.

    “Do you (or anyone else for that matter) have more information about the previous “4 violent acts” that Bell commmited in the past?”

    I don’t. The only thing I could possibly tell you is town gossip, because juvenile records are sealed. I DO know that one girl from Jena (she’s about 22 y.o.) was punched by one of the Jena 6 and she called the police. I’m not 100% sure which one it was, and I’m not sure if she pressed charges. If I were to guess, it was probably Mychal Bell or Robert Bailey. But, again, that is just a guess. I don’t think there’s anything I can pull up at the courthouse to prove that.

    “Our democratic process involves us writing our local congressmen to get the laws changed first, then implementing them accordingly.”

    YOU ARE SO RIGHT!! Most people who are so gung-ho about the Jena 6 discuss so many of the unfair quirks of the Jena justice system, when it is actually echoing what the United States justice system is. If they want to get mad about alot of this, they need to try to change laws and write their congressman, not complain that Jena’s justice system is unfair.

  92. Charla says:

    From Jena: I’ll get right to the point…

    “Come gather that yourself. I have no way of obtaining that information unless I visit the school. It’s unlikely that charges have been pressed for any of the high school FIGHTS before this BEATING.”

    This is my point exactly. I am not a legal expert; can someone define the difference between the charges of engaging in a fight and participating in a beating? What is the legal definition of a “beating” as opposed to a “legal” fight? As long as the numbers are even, no one is charged with anything, is that how it works? What is the defining factor between the two? I’m hoping it’s not determined by numbers; if this were the case, what you previously stated would shed a totally different light on the case in Bailey’s assault:
    “According to Robert Bailey’s statement, he was punched by only two guys that night. He was conscious. He was able to defend himself. He also says that other white boys came after his two friends, who were black. This is Robert Bailey’s version of the story. I don’t have copies of the other statements yet. So EVEN FROM ROBERT BAILEY’S side, it was 3 or 4 on 3.”

    If it were truly 3-on-3, no one should have been charged for fighting, or all six should have been charged (I don’t condone fighting, or beatings, at all, fair or not; it is a public nuisance, and a safety hazard for those who are unfortunate enough to be in the vicinty). If it were 4-on-3, does this constitute a beating? Does is make it okay for someone to assault you, and not be charged with a more severe charge because “you were conscious” and thus able to defend yourself? It does not alter the fact that you were assaulted; I’m sorry, but I must respectfully disagree with your comparison to the situation as opposed to mine. So far I have googled to no avail a similar case involving a “beating” of this nature in Louisiana case law, and have not found one (again, it doesn’t look like the law makes a big deal of stipulating the difference between the two; sad, but true).

    I will state for the record From Jena that I fully respect, and appreciate your point of view, and your input from a closer angle than most of us could imagine. Please remember that I am not interested in bashing other people’s points of views. I participate in this blog to engage in SENSIBLE CONVERSATION with the hope of bringing a greater, and better, understanding of what this situation is really about, excluding biased media coverage and “town gossip”. Again, stone cold facts.

    Thanx for the link; promise to read it tonight before bed, hopefully will respond tomorrow. If I can get my hands on some case logs similar to this case I’ll post them so we can all compare those situations/sentences to this one.

    By the way, what do you think the appropriate punish should be, THAT THE LAW CURRENTLY ALLOWS, for this crime? I pose this question not to put you “on the spot”, but to get a general consensus of what us debaters are arguing as “too extreme” and “not extreme enough”. If you choose not to answer I understand; if you are offended, my apologies. Me personally, I think he has more than served his time (he’s been in jail since December, right?).
    I’m not painting any of these young men out to be angels, as I have stated before, but in my neck of the woods I’ve seen far more heinous offenses committed, day in and day out, by repeat offenders, with REAL WEAPONS, and law enforcement can’t even put them in jail because the jails are overcrowded with people that have committed even more heinous crimes than they have. Where do we draw the line? I’m still looking for any case log that involves a tennis shoe being a weapon, I personally have never heard of this happening.

    Can’t wait for the online witness statements and such, thank you for engaging in civil conversation without being idiotic how some folks can be. James Black, thanx for the info on the weapons in vehicles; I’ll keep it in mind the next time a State Trooper grills me about carrying mine….

  93. Charla says:

    I’m sorry, I neglected to inform you that I do live in Louisiana, in the Lafayette area, so I am not too far out of touch with “how things are down here” as some people may think….

  94. From Jena says:

    Charla:

    I think we agree on some things and disagree on others. And you are right, it’s okay to disagree on things. Two people who present facts and logical arguments can help each other discover the truth. So I’m all about talking to you and I’d be happy to continue discussing all of this with you. I’m not offended at all.

    I think the sentencing all depends on their prior record. Since Mychal Bell shows 4 prior violent acts, I think he should get more prison time (2 to 3 years). If it’s over 5, I’d think that is way too harsh. Honesty, if they released him on his sentencing date, I wouldn’t disagree with it because he had already served almost a year (you are correct with the date).

    One of these boys is (I believe) a sophomore in high school and I think his case is gonna be a juvenile case. I suspect he’ll get a slap on the wrist but I’m not sure.

    If any of these guys have no criminal record, I think a fair sentence is a year in prison or less (including time already served). If they have a criminal record, I think the sentence should be a little harsher.

    That is, assuming they all can be clearly placed at the scene. From what I’ve heard, there was around 40 eye witnesses who made statements. I believe the only one of the Jena 6 who had an eye witness say he wasn’t there was Mychal Bell. But I believe a WHOLE bunch said he was. I haven’t looked at the Jena 6 case in detail yet. I only have a few documents related to it right now.

    As far as the debate about “fight” and “beating”, Alan Bean (Friends of Justice guy, pro Jena 6) did say he feels it was a beating and not a fight, since Justin Barker had no chance to defend himself at any point in the ordeal. I quoted his sentence in a comment above. There are other things he said, but I don’t want to post someone’s email up for all to see. I think that’d be a little rude.

  95. Charla says:

    From Jena:

    OK, read the article from the link you provided above. I have a slightly better understanding of the timeline of events (I guess). What made absolutely no sense at all to me is this caption in particular:

    “Fowler said that the boys would have received much lighter charges without all the attention, although the only attention on the case before the charges were bumped from battery to attempted murder was from local media including The Town Talk and The Jena Times.”

    I’m confused; it seems like this would work the other way around. Any clue why he decided to bump the charges up? Were people (Jena residents, or anyone else following the case) complaining that the battery charges were too light, thus the increase in the charge? What was the time span between the initial charge, and the decision to increase it?

    Maybe I’m just stupid today (Labor Day, enjoying my day off, maybe my brain is lazing more than my body is). Anyone care to explain?

    There are other captions in this article that I have issues with, EASILY, but bringing them up at this point is almost null and void, plus I don’t want to continue writing a book each time I post something. I’ll check back for responses…thanx for the link.

  96. From Jena says:

    Charla:

    I’m not sure what he’s saying there. From what I know about everything, it started OUT as attempted murder and was reduced at the day of the trial. If he bumped them up before he bumped them back down, I’m not sure. I have not heard anything like that yet.

    I don’t think ANYBODY in my town thinks they deserve attempted murder charges (except for maybe Justin Barker’s family). And no one I’ve spoke to think Mychal Bell deserves to get maximum sentencing for this crime.

    And I don’t mind if you write a book, I’ve written enough for a book in here already, too. It’s cool.

  97. James Black says:

    Second degree battery RS 14:34.1

    Second degree battery is a batery committed without consent of the victim when the offender intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury.

    Serious bodily injury means bodily injury which involves UNCONSCIOUSNESS, or extreme physical pain or protracted and obvious disfigurement, or substantial risk of death.

    ACTS 1978, Nn. 394,.1

    I dont think many people can disagree ,Barker was knocked unconscious. After reading this straight out of Louisiana Law I dont see how the DA could have charged Bell with any thing less than second degree battery.

    So all of the arguing and opinions about anything before this event apparently doesnt matter much. I dont see anyway there can be any other verdict.

  98. From Jena says:

    James Black:

    Oh believe me, there will be excuses. I’ve come to expect that.

  99. Charla says:

    From Jena:

    I’ll see if I can find the timeline for this again somewhere. Whether he started with a higher charge or a lower charge is not what is peaking my interest; the fact that it was changed (whether up or down) is what I’m curious about. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, it does all the time, just would like to know if it was a result of public outcry for a stiffer or lesser sentence, or if he re-evaluated the evidence and reconsidered his decision. I’m pretty sure you’re right though; the initial charge was murder, then reduced. That’s why I was totally confused about this statement, it just didn’t make any sense to me (maybe he just said it backwards unknowingly, I don’t know).

  100. Charla says:

    James Black:

    Not to put you on the spot either, but what do you think the sentence should be? And yes, I have been informed about Bell’s previous VIOLENT CRIMINAL ACTS many times now, so taking that into consideration (since I’m sure it will be considered at sentencing anyway), what do you think?

  101. Charla says:

    Jack Black: Perhaps you should read this statute again (Second degree battery RS 14:34.1). Tell me if you think I’m over-reading:

    §34.1. Second degree battery

    Second degree battery is a battery committed without the consent of the victim when the offender intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury.

    I hate to say it, but either this is a typographical error in this law, or it just doesn’t make any sense. If someone “consents” to a beating, or assault, then it is not an assault (I don’t see who would volunteer themselves for this).

    Again, we should take a closer look at our laws…

  102. Charla says:

    Here’s the link, so you won’t think I’m just copying/pasting misinformation from any BS site. This is an official site….

    http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=78445

    Hope the link works…

  103. James Black says:

    That is no typo, I printed it out and thats exactly what is said. I did find that part strange but that doesnt change the rest of it. As for your earier question I expect Bell to get 5 years and do 1. Also expect the others to get 1 year with the sentence suspended and 5 years probation.

  104. From Jena says:

    Charla:

    I think either one or more of these things happened with Reed Walters:

    1.) He realized he had no case for attempted murder and downgraded the charges.

    2.) The media pressure finally got to him.

    3.) It was a maneuver to ensure that they were tried as adults and not juveniles.

    I think two is very unlikely. I think it’s probably a combination of 1 & 3. Do you know if this is typical practice for a lawyer to maneuver this way? I’m not sure that was his motives, but it was kind of a theory I developed on my own.

  105. Charla says:

    LOL, sorry James, I was not referring to what you posted as a typo, but a typo in the law itself as it is written (that’s why I supplied the link, so you could read it directly from the site to be sure I didn’t mistype). My focus was more so this phrase:

    “Second degree battery is a battery committed without the consent of the victim”. The implication does not make sense to me; I’ve never heard of anyone consenting to anyone beating the crap out of them, “strange”, as you said. There’s a big problem with the wording of the law is all I’m saying. They could have really omitted that phrase altogether, the statute would make a lot more sense.

    Earlier, I asked you what you thought the sentence SHOULD be; you replied what you “expect”. I was asking YOUR opinion of what a fair sentence should be, not what you predict the sentence WILL BE. Please clarify; I don’t like jumping to conclusions.

    From Jena: I agree with you on number one for sure. And number two is definitely out (if he were the type of guy to cave under media pressure he would’ve done so a long time ago; he had ample opportunity to do so). Number three, I don’t know. It would make sense if juveniles cannot be tried as adults on aggravated battery charges, but they can (or can they? If not, our country’s judicial process is worse than I thought). There’s a significant difference in attempted second degree murder and aggravated battery, yet both are obviously serious enough to carry long prison sentences. I just wonder why the attempted murder charge was chosen from jump, even factoring in a tennis shoe as the “dangerous weapon”. I’m still searching the LA State Law site (it’s a mess; they should really do a better job of organizing all this info. Too hard to search/find what you’re looking for). If I can find something that stipulates the different criteria for the two I’ll post the link for anyone interested.

  106. Charla says:

    Sorry Laura (is Laura still the moderator?). I did not mean to use this word in an offense manner.

    I’ll be careful of my selection in the future.

  107. Brett says:

    The reason the 2nd degree attempted murder charges were brought is because the aggravated battery was on a juvenile. If you read the 2nd degree murder charge, you can see it makes reference to crime against juveniles. “(b) When the offender is engaged in the perpetration of cruelty to juveniles, even though he has no intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.”

    Since the victim didn’t die, only attempted 2nd degree murder is available. This charge has a maximum penalty of half the maximum of doing the actually charge. With 2nd degree murder, you can get life, so half of that according to Louisiana law is 50 years without parole. If you’ve been convicted of other violent crimes, that sentence doubles, so Bell would be back up to life imprisonment.

    Of course the DA dropped that charge. If you think it’s uncommon for a DA to “pad” the charges on someone, you don’t know our legal system. This happens with blacks, whites, everyone. This allows them to plea bargain and save the time and money for a trail. If he really wanted to ruin Bell’s life, he could have left that charge on there and probably have gotten conviction. He also could have added the Hate Crime law Louisiana has since the battery was based on race.

    Bell…Consider yourself lucky.

  108. Laura says:

    is Laura still the moderator?

    Well, it’s still my blog and my server, so technically yes, but the fact is I have read very few of the comments lately. As you may have noticed, once one comment is approved, the rest go straight through, so I’m not required to read them all for them to be posted. The moderated queue of new comments has been full of the most hateful, racist, offensive garbage that I’ve seen in a long time, including threats. So what little time I’ve spent on this blog in the last ten days has largely been consumed with dealing with that.

    I’ve been off in the real world helping with funeral arrangements and dealing with some major work problems the rest of the time and basically trusting y’all to behave yourselves. I glanced upthread but didn’t see what you’re apologizing for – whatever it was, I appreciate your sensitivity and courtesy in apologizing and in keeping the tone of the debate high.
    Thanks,
    Laura

  109. James Jackson says:

    I am a first time visitor to this site. As I read the postings they became kinder and gentler. Which is a good thing. As always, most of the discussions fell correspondingly on different sides of the huge racial divide that exist in the country.

    I am a 66 yo American male who happens to be black. I grew up in the Jim Crow south. I have no criminal record and I am a Viet Nam Vet. By the time I was 15, I came to believe the laws were designed to protect the whites and prosecute the blacks. That opinion has changed some but not very much. Now to add to that, prosecution is less likely if you have money regardless of race. In small town USA where the white judges, police force and white citizens mostly grew up together. They go to church together and their children are friends. In situations like this it hard for a black person get a fair trial if it involves a white citizen. The white defense lawyer as well, could also be a friend of the white citizen.

    Had the victim of this fight in Jena been black, the it would have been just a slap on the wrist. Or, had the perpetrators been white and victim black, the same slap on the wrist. I am not stating my opinion as facts, this is just what I believe. Another thing I believe is that with media coverage today, many people go into a trial as jurors expecting a defendant to be proven innocent instead of guilty. That is just the opposit of what is intended. The court of public opinion is too strong today and plays a major role in that concepts.

    Some people are hard core racist and in others Racisim is an involuntary responce. In the mind of the average citizen, the subconscious mind makes a subtle change when it comes to race and it is not notice by the consious mind. We all have varying degrees of it. We have to admit that race plays a role in all phases of the American behavior.

    I think some form of punishmet should occur to these young men. I also think this 22 years is over kill. This over kill occurs too much for black youths if the incident involves a white person. Example; The 7 year sentence for a 14 yo black female student shoved a white hall monitor in Paris, TX, the 17 years sentence for 17 yo black male HS student for having sex with his 15 yo white girl friend in GA. At the same time 4 white males beat a developementally disabled black male, left him unconsicous in a ditch, on and ant bed. They were found not guilty by an all white jury. However, they were later convicted in a civil court. The jury foreman said they were good old boys having a little fun. No white people were up set about. At least, not as upset as they are about Micheal Vick and the dogs.

    Think about all of those black people (31) wrongly convicted in Tulia TX on tainted drug charges by a crooked narcotic agent. Thank God the Gov. of Texas saw fit pardon them. There have been 12 black people released from prison in last year that were wrongly convicted in Dallas, Tx. A black electical engineer was wrongly convicted of robbing a churches chicken few years back, had to be released from prison. The justice system is heavily imbued with racisim. It is not unique to Jena. The thing that worries me is that many white americans are not conscious that it exist.

    This is one blacks man’s opinion.

    BLACKMALE

  110. James Black says:

    Charla

    After careful thought about the consent part of that law, I have come to this conclusion I believe it could have been put there for this reason. You no in our society today their are alot of weird fetishes that involve beating and mutilation. Maybe this consent is put in there in case a person happens to go to far or maybe just ends up in a hospital. As any time a person goes to a hospital with injurys that appear to be from a beating a investigation normally occurs. This is to stop domestic violence that may not be reported. I would assume if the person in hospital had given the one who beat them consent to do it, then even with an investigation they couldnt be charged. Also if you ever saw the show jackass you would know what I am talking about. Regardless this is my best guess.

  111. Mary says:

    Thank God that we have people that are not afraid to stand up to these people who are making a mockery of this situation. I’ve heard of some of the most sinister individuals in my lifetime, this is an outrage! My heart and prayers go out to Michael’s family, keep the faith, God has the last word.

  112. A Pox on Both Your Houses says:

    Regarding “consenting to Battery”…..Old joke: “I went to a fight the other night, and a Hockey Game broke out.”

    Fights regularly occur at hockey games, basketball games, baseball games, and football games….yet there are almost never any Criminal Charges filed.

    This is because the Law holds that when you step on the field, put on your pads, and suit up you already know there is an element of violence in the game, and you are – in effect – consenting to risk being hit.

    Therefore, no “assault” is considered to have taken place, as you knew what you were getting into.

    If the two of us decide to step outside and “settle it man to man” then each of us is consenting to be hit, and no assault can be claimed to have taken place.

    However, if we step outside, and you pull out a baseball bat – and 5 buddies – I cannot be claimed to have consented to that…and you should be charged with assault/battery.

    The Law is entirely reasonable to make this distinction.

    Somebody who is “cold-caulked” “blind-sided” or “sucker-punched” cannot be said to have consented to being hit, if they had no idea it was coming….therefore, a charge of assault/battery is reasonable.

    If someone is unconscious, and somebody else has sexual intercourse with them, the law clearly considers that to be a sexual assault, as there could be no consent.

    If someone is unconscious, and somebody deliberately injures their body – or tries to do violence to them – there can be no consent implied, and assault/battery has taken place.

    White Supporters: America has a longstanding history of racism and that includes the legal system failing to protect Blacks and abusing Blacks in the interest of maintaining White Supremacy.

    Please do not try to pretend that you are one happy family in Jena…most whites have no idea what Black folks really think about situations – because it is very seldom that most white people can have candid conversations with Black people about such sensitive matters.

    Black folks learned a long time ago that it is not adaptive for their survival and long-term benefit to be absolutely honest with whites about what is on their minds….

    America is horribly racist *still* and you have only to read the blog comments on popular sites such as AOL to see and hear the ignorant, toxic thoughts that many whites are unashamed to publish…anonymously, of course, but even in public.

    Even the Moderator of this forum – this Oasis – has had to censor the filth coming from both sides of the equation.

    Black Supporters: As usual, in response to the imbalances in the history of this racist system, you automatically side with Blacks charged with anything, because you are sure there is a conspiracy somewhere, and something unfair about the whole thing somewhere….and because you have been right so often in the past.

    You leap to the defense of creeps and jerks and gangstas indiscriminately. There are trouble-makers in the Black community (just like in the white community) who manipulate situations and enjoy being bullies.

    Mychal Bell is not a martyr, he has a criminal record, and you would let him keep going until he literally gets away with murder….just because he can score touchdowns, or whatever else he does as a star athlete.

    Keep on trying to normalize the violence of what happened, and act like it was just a normal schoolyard “fight”….it was the kind of assault and brutality that too often is glorified in Gangsta rap – and urban street culture – and condoned by all the decent Black folks who continue to be silent about the violence and hatred of women which Black and white children are being bombarded with in videos and on the radio and in their MP3 players daily.

    You are condoning a culture of violence and brutality, one which sucked Michael Vick in, by his own admission.

    A pox on both your houses, you white deniers of the clear and present danger and reality of Racism, and you Black deniers of the culture of violence you excuse and admire all too often.

    Like with all wars, the truth is always the first casualty in this latest battle in the War of the Races.

    I salute those willing to try to reason things out, and document their points of view – in black and white (pun intended).

    That kind of dialogue will be the only lasting solution to this kind of conflict.

    Keep this one thought in mind, please:

    It has been scientifically documented that whites respond more harshly to perceived wrongdoing by Blacks, than they do to the same behaviors exhibited by whites.

    The differential incidence with which the death penalty is given as a sentence is one example, and the social psychological research of Aaronson and others is another example.

    The Emmett Till case is but one of many where whites literally got away with murder in the South.

    One could look it up, if one were not too busy denying and trash talking.

    I want Mychal Bell and the others punished for their roles in this *crime*.

    And I want them punished to the same degree, and no more, than would be normal for white bullies.

    That kind of behavior is not about civil rights…it is about civilization…and we do not save it, or improve it, by going about beating people senseless, regardless if it is one on one, or twenty to one.

    This was not the same kind of situation that drove the Black Panthers and Malcolm X to realistically consider the need for weapons of self-defense, and shame on any who would exploit it in that manner.

    If the town situation were *that* racist and terrifying to Blacks, how did poor Bailey and the others *ever* get up the nerve to visit a primarily white party and demand to be let in?

    Like I said already, Agitators on *both* sides: a pox on both your houses.

  113. From Jena says:

    A Pox on Both Your Houses:

    Very well put. There’s nothing in your posting that I do not agree with. One of the first postings on here that genuinely seem in the middle of the road as far as polarity to the Jena 6 situation.

    Stay in here and keep debating about this. Maybe you can help bridge the gap between opinions on here.

  114. Brett says:

    The word CONSENT is added to the battery definition for a few reasons. Consent involves unintentional touching that may happen in certain jobs or situations. Consent is also legally used to describe normal touching that might happen in the course of a sports game. Otherwise if you accidentally touch someone’s hand in a small isle at the gas station, you could be arrested for battery. By being in public, you consent and accept the risk to an accident touching that yields no harm.

  115. Mother of 3 boys (7,9,&10) says:

    First, I want to say RIGHT is RIGHT and WRONG is WRONG! If anyone with young boys should really be opened to answer this simple question…..if this was your children (black or white) would you want the penalty to be as
    severe for a simple high school FIGHT? – You win some and you lose some, we all should be teaching our
    children how and when to defend themselves but 22 years for a FIGHT is just simply wrong especially when
    the “victim” was treated at a hospital and later resumed with “his” everyday life by attending an evening function.
    Jena legal systems needs cleaning up………

  116. Riley says:

    A difficult on, a very very difficult one. The DA has messed this case up so badly that very likely now, few outsiders actually believe the boys are at all guilty.

    Fact – The whole process drips with racism and race related fervour.

    My first instinct on reading about this was to wonder what the catch was – were these boys really innocent boys, begging for a ride? Or were they criminals who were pulling the colour card and playing on racial sensitivities to cover a life of crime?

    There’s definitely a history of racism, nicely concealed under the classification of “minor prank”. Hanging a noose from a tree is in no way harmless, prank though it may be. It sends out severe emotional and psychological signals. I’m not african american, and can’t trace a single slave in my recent ancestry yet reading about this prank caused me a fair bit of distress. I can only imagine what it must have felt like for the african americans who actually saw the nooses. That’s why I wonder at the remarks by From Jena and James Black.

    There’s something very ugly lurking under the surface of that city, and it’s all going to come out now. If those boys had received a fair sentence, all this won’t have happened.

  117. Ulysses says:

    This is an outrage…… Can you say DOUBLE STANDARD. Unfortunenately, this is not anything new.
    For example, there was a case in Las Vegas several years ago…..Two white guys followed a young blackgirl
    into the ladies bathroom. One of them raped and killed her and other one walk out but did not report the
    crime. Needless to say, the one that walked out and did not call security the judge let him go free…..Reason
    The judge said he did not have an ax to grind so he did not charge him with anything. Now flip the script, if
    two youg black guys were faced with the same situation they both would have the book thrown at them.
    Jasper Texas, James Byrd , who was dragged until body came apart. All the white guys envolved should have gotten the death penilty……Not….. Flip the script , if a group of young black guys would done the same thing they would have gotten the dealth penilty. There is a long list of such cases all over the United States.

    Vengence is mine said the LORD.

  118. Debroah says:

    My comment is more of a question, since this town is so small and according to everything I have read about the town being 85% white, is there a reason the trials can’t be moved to another parrish for a better chance of the boys getting a fair trial.
    I feel like violence is the wrong way to go, but appealing to others nationwide will get the word out, and will get more publicity for the boys that are on trial and to the town of Jena and other problems of racism that other Blacks are facing.
    As a school employee, I have seen several fights and these fights are always handled within the school unless they happened off campus. In addition the administrators are suppose to be open to the feelings of every student in the district that they are heading.
    Again I will say that NO, violence is not the way to go and I pray no is suggesting that.

  119. TJ Johnson 2nd says:

    Most of the people here seems to be taking their eye off the prize.
    The prize should be the punishment does not fit the crime.
    yes there was a fight however it does not consist of serving life in jail to please the majority of Jena. It also does not mean that the minority should have to stop seeking justice and fair living conditions in Jena. The prize people Please stop focusing on spelling and white and black though they play a part it is not what this is about. Cause we all know if a group of whites men/boys/teenagers shoot throw some females up in this also. It seems in this town they would have been given metals and awards for taking the life of another black person. Is this what we want for our children’s children

  120. This is Crazy says:

    I have traveled the world due to the military and I have lived in Mississippi for the past ten years, and yes the small town that I lived in was racially divided. The African Americans lived on one side of the tracks and Caucasians lived on the other side. There are still schools that are 99.9% caucasians. This is especially true in Alabama, Mississippi, and Georgia. As far as the Jena Six, the punishment is crazy. Whatever happened to school suspension for fighting. Those African American kids WILL NOT get a fair trial in Jena, Alabama. I have worked in a law firm for the last couple of years in Mississippi and I have seen and heard a lot. I have seen in black in white where a caucasion judge will give a lighter sentence (a slap on the wrist) to a caucasion person and then turn around and give an African American with no record jail time and outrageous fines for the exact same crime. People need to wake up and realize that racism exists and as people continue to tolerate it then it will continue to exist “in the open”.

  121. UrbanGirl says:

    This case is just another example of racism. To be exact racial injustice. While it makes me absolutely ill to my stomach, racism will NEVER go away. So what he had a past–we all do. It does not justify why he was charged so heavily. His past had nothing to do with them wanting to sit under a tree that the Almighty God created, but it was called the “white” tree. That is extremely ridiculous–especially in this day & age. Why weren’t the causcasian children charged? Tell me that? They hung nooses which shows a clear hatred for blacks. Reed Walters came to that school and told blacks students that he can destroy there lives with a stroke of a pen. So, he’s not racist, huh?

  122. charlotte says:

    they should have gotten the same treatmeat as the white kids this is not 1955 were white were treated better than blacks that is wrong

  123. James Black says:

    I dont know where all of you people went to school or where you live, but I thank god I dont live anywhere a 6 on 1 fight is just a school fight. If that is they way it is where you live you better try to fix it before it is to late. If 1 of those boys had wanted to fight Barker and had kicked his ass nothing would have been said it would have been just a school fight. They both would have been suspended. But no like cowards are some kind of gang it took six. Apparently you live in very violent places , we dont put up with that here and nerver will black or white. You commit a crime you will do time. That is the way it should be everywhere and then things like this would happen less often. A black guy shot me the bird today , tomorrow 6 of us are going to beat him senseless. NOT REALLY but you see you are all condoning this type behavior. You need to think about what you are calling a regular school fight.

  124. BENITA TRUSS says:

    I live In New York now, but I grew up In B’ham, from the age of 10 to 19 then I move back to new york . But i grew up in a Jim Crow town, which make me want to help in some kinda way. What I did was sent the Jena 6 web site around in the job and ask would my co-worker either sign the petition or give to a collection for their defense. I work for Verizon, now what I need to know is who would I send the collection to.

    I was listening to Micheal Basin and I heard him say that the Bell kid was being release and it brought tear to my eye . I was very happy to hear that, May god Bless him and his family, now i would like to hear that with the other 5 kids,for their family to have the same joy and would love to see the official down there have them removed from their jobs that goes for the lawyer,Da,and the Judge,and the School official that chg the desicion and said it was a prank

  125. McI says:

    Free Jena6.
    It’s funny when children try to discuss a topic they know nothing about. (RACISM , LAW & INJUSTICE). Get alife and contribute more to society. Why, don’t you began by donating some of your time to helping the less fortunate, since you have all this time to debate back and forth. Why, don’t you write a book about ALL your opions, oops.. No one would by it!

    FREE JENA6
    The Aliens Are coming to Jena on The 20th to help the other Aliens

  126. McI says:

    No one would buy it !!!

    FREE JENA6

  127. Louisiana Native says:

    I have been reading this blog and I really don’t know what to say. I was born and raised in Louisiana and left in 2003 when I graduated from college. I can’t say I am surprised by what happened in Jena. It happens over the entire state. Obviously some of the comments from the citizens of Jena clearly represent the fact that there is a visible amount of racial tension in the town. How in hell are you going to declare a “White tree” at a public school that everybody’s tax money funds. Let me stop before I start saying stupid stuff like some of these other people here have been saying. Sneakers are not a deadly weapon, no one should be spending 22 years in jail because of a fight, and white children should not hang nuses in trees if they don’t want to get beat down, the DA should be fired and forced to go to a real law school, the trial should be moved to another city, and the appropriate sentences should be handed down for the actual crime. I am not surprised that there are not federal laws against hanging a nuse in a tree or racism but it seems like something that will possibly be hitting the books in the near future. If the white people in Jena are getting death threats, tell them to go and ask the black citizens who have been dealing with this mess for years how to handle it. There are problems in Jena, the state of Louisiana and the majority of the old south. I am glad I left, and although I visit from time to time, I can only stay for a short while because I am sickened by the ignorance and stupidity that still exsists there. The justice system in Louisiana will never be just as long as the ones responsible for upholding the laws are wearing hoods when they get off work.

  128. djmmm says:

    Is it true that a minority was assaulted by a group of (5) white kids a day before this incident? Why were they not charged? This was a over kill by the DA,s office. The defendant,s lawyer should be disbarred for legal misrepresentation, Judicial forms should be filed against the Lawyer, prosecutor, and judge. this is a horrible tragedy and those six kids will be scared for life.

    [The incident at the Fair Barn where Robert Bailey may have been beaten or was in a fight is very much in dispute. The Town Talk, which has provided a lot of good reporting on the Jena 6, interviewed Donald Washington, an FBI agent (who came to smooth things over, not investigate, as his disingenuousness about selective prosecution proves) said that it wasn't a white on black beating - it was several black teens, several white teens and men, and evidently Bailey didn't go to the hospital, so any injuries he may have had are not documented. - Laura]

  129. alyce says:

    I believe when Bell, Bailey and Shaw came out of that store and Justin pointed the shotgun at him, the 3 kids “wrestled” it from him and later turned it over to the police. It has been a while since I read the details of that, but I do believe the 3 kids got charged with crimes. Perhaps the “battery” charge was due to the fighting over the shotgun and perhaps the shotgun was the “damaged property”. Many kids get into fights. In a racist town like Jena, I would not be surprised that the prior “criminal” charges were similiar to the thrumped up charges. Cospiracy to commit murder? If that were even a remote possibiltiy then the kids would have been choosing to spend their lives in jail, knowing a fight at school would get them arrested.

    DA Reed’s career is being investigated for past misconduct.

    [alyce, Justin Barker was not at the Gotta Go. Bailey definitely was, I'm not sure about Bell and Shaw. What happened at the Gotta Go has been disputed; we need more information about it which I have so far not been able to get. I agree that there was no conspiracy. I haven't seen a thing to persuade me of that so far. As for Reed Walters being investigated, I haven't seen that anywhere, got a link? - Laura]

  130. James Black says:

    djmmm
    No its not true.e nobody was attacked by white students or whites in general the day before or any other time.

    Went to the homecoming football game last night as usual blacks and whites were sitting together throughout the stands. Absolutely no problems as usual. Carwin Jones”s sister was on the homecoming court as was another black girl. The black news reporter for KALB asked all the homecoming court and cheerleaders along with several citizens about their feelings about Bells conviction being thrown out. Apparently she didnt get find anything juicy enough from the Jena people to put on air, she did put comments from 2 people in the stands from Jonesvilles team on the 10 o clock news> One defended Barker and the other defended Bell.

    I also saw three pictures of Robert Bailey’s brother on myspace with several hundred dollar bills hanging from his mouth and several thousand dollars laying in his lap, not to mention his large gold chain and pendant. His mother also just bought a new jaguar. Pretty good for someone who doesnt work and lives in a run down trailer. Just thought all of you donaters would like to know where the Jena 6 defense fund was going. This is the best thing that ever happened to them or so it seems.

    I am glad Bell will be in juvnile court now. Everything he has done in the past comes into play now, in the previous trial he was only tried for this beating. Now all priors are in play, he violated his probation that was in effect until his 18th birthday. All his school behavior and detention is also considered. There will be no jury so no one can cry because of a all white jury. No press will be allowed in the courtroom. They also will have no access to anything that goes on. Only him and the judge. 4 years is the most I believe he can get, dont be surprised if he gets it.

    Laura
    I also dont think you are considersd a juvenile if you are over 16 which the others were. That is in Louisiana anyway.

  131. Ms Purnell says:

    This was racial turn political shit. how can the supertrend justify the noose hanging the tree as prank (i don’t see any thing funny) about that. the DA and the judge should be a shame of them self due to the fact they HS diploma is black and white so how can they do that to that young boy and they bleed the same color as a black person this is not the 60′s anymore so they need to get off the bull crap
    they trying to give him time like he shot some one. the kids beat his ass that all. they lucky they don’t live in NY & attend NY school. they would not been able to put the noose in the tree. they lucky that he got a ass whipping and he is not dead. just one thing i don’t under stand why they did not get charge for putting the noose in the tree. if he would had hung that noose up in NY he would been in it hanging. I’m very mad at that stuff. how do you give some one 22 years and give someone 3 days suspension that don’t add up. just you give someone 3 day’s for attempt murder 1 day for murder that don’t sound right. no no so why must he get 22 year’s. they had tolerance so why he did not get in trouble for the noose and Mychal got 22 for a fight on school ground.

  132. kingfish1935 says:

    what is the source for his criminal record? Not disagreeing necessarily, just want a link or source so I can back it up if I use it.

  133. katindc says:

    I normally do not blog however the Jena Six case has really grasped my attention. I thought that all juvenile charges were private. I wonder how many successful public figures (politicians, ministers, etc.) would be were they were if the public had access to their juvenile records. It is bad enough that it is LIES all around us but of course allot of people cover up there deceit very well. No one knows why Mychael even has those charges. Honestly, I do not care. What is going on is racism and injustice in my eyes. The media will not persuade me to change my mind on what is really going on. I looked at least two of the other Jena six accused on television only to hear one say he wasn’t there at all and the other admitted to looking on only. Both stated they never even touched Justin period. I truly think he would have been beat a little worst then that just by looking at the picture. I have seen people beat up worse than that by one person. I wonder if they are doing 20, 30 or 80 years for fighting. I doubt it. I can tell you know….I am Happy the Society is Showing Me that Blacks have not Arrived as Many may think. I am very successful, intelligent black woman. Know that I know where I came from and I thank my ancestors for getting me this far. My ancestor fought too hard to have me think I am above the cause. It is bad enough we are still under that Willie Lynch mentality. DON’T BE MANIPULATED!!!! LOOK UP WILLIE LYNCH…IF YOU HAVE NOT ALREADY!!!

  134. metrodirtman says:

    I have three things I’d like to say:
    1. Blogs are a tricky business. While they offer greater democracy, in giving people space to have their voices heard, they also tend to have lower standards of verification than the journalism i was trained in. So, as the mega-corporate news media become more and more lazy, greed-based and corrupt, and less and less committed to verification and providing accurate and fully or fairly contextualized stories, we have the internet and rise of blogs to fill in holes. Unfortunately, some of the holes being filled in may be false information, similar to the garbage our politicians often hand the news media as facts. It’s called spin.
    I don’t trust any single source of information, or even multiple sources, which may in fact just be repeating the same rumor. To wit, I don’t trust 167 James Black’s claim that the parent of one of the Jena Six is driving a new jaguar now purchased from donations to their defense. If it is a true fact and not a rumor, I would like to know Mr. Black’s sources for the allegation. It is a very serious accusation. If it is true, it is indeed a terrible abuse of people’s trust. But if it is a lie, then Mr. Black is guilty of a terrible abuse of people’s trust.
    What are the standards on this blog of fact-checking before releasing such allegations over the airwaves? Ms Laura has made some good decisions, it seems to me, about questioning certain claims some writers have put forth here. I wonder why no such question was voiced adjacent to Mr. Black’s allegations in entry # 167?
    2. Separating the issue of racism from the issue of violence is important in this matter. Certainly it is reasonable to question whether beating up Justin Barker was called for, and it is reasonable to expect consequences for anybody, white or black, who gangs up on a single individual, even one who rudely insults them. But the larger issue in this case of the Jena Six is clearly the unequal treatment blacks and whites are handed by the legal justice system, which racists continually exploit, given their greater clout in society since the so-called “end of slavery.”
    3. Thus, I believe we all, whites especially, must step forward to defend the rights of the Jena Six to fair and equal treatment before the law, and law enforcement officers, be they cops or judges, lawyers or prison guards, must have justice meted out against them to the extent they violate defendants’ rights to just treatment and respect as human beings who are innocent until proved guilty, and that charges and punishments must be proportional to the offenses committed. As far as fighting and levels of violence, or violation of others’ rights during a fight, there are reasonable ways to teach errant young people how to correct their ways, how to handle offense with dignity and how to communicate with others of different cultures or skin colors as human beings of equal and infinite worth, as fellow creatures of God with equal duties to be kind and polite and equal rights to fair treatment and general respect. Oh, and whether any of the defendants has any prior convictions is irrelevant. Each case must be judged on its own merits. And for anyone to deny that blatant racism permeates this case is to be like the people who cut down that tree. Pretending you can make something disappear by not letting it be seen doesn’t change the fact of its existence. Nooses placed on a tree by white kids used to arrogantly presuming exclusive title to the shade of a tree that every student’s parent shares ownership of as taxpayers is nothing if not the crudest and most blatant and appalling slap in the face to both the blacks of this country and all the whites and other people of whatever color and culture who have sacrificed so much to create a dignified polity and society for all of us. Perpetrating racism hurts us all, and all our children and their children, but most especially those it targets.

  135. kiki says:

    well i really don’t think that michael bell’s past should be an issue here, and another thing , i thought that if you are under the age of 21 and have a criminal record it supposed to be sealed, well i think that michael bell’s family should take action on that , he is a juvinile, so i don’t think that his records should be aired in the first place other than his lawyer. SEALED POINT BLANK.

  136. kiki says:

    WELL IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA WHERE I AM FROM , IF A PERSON OR PERSON’S UNDER THE AGE OF 19 AND HAVE A CRIMINAL BACKGROUND , THE BACKGROUND SUPPOSED TO BE SEALED WHERE NOONE CAN GET IN IT, SO WHY IS MICHAEL BELL’S PRIVITE DOCUMENTS ARE SCATTERED ALL ACROSS AMERICA, I THINK HIS PARENT’S SHOULD LOOK DEEPLY INTO THAT, BECAUSE SOMEONE HAS BROKEN THE LAW THEMSELVES.

  137. Simplify says:

    [Edited by Laura - I'm *not* getting into all this again. I thought I had closed comments on all these old posts. Read the most recent Jena 6 posts, especially the final one.]

Trackbacks

  1. South Korean Guests of Taliban to be Released; Unt…

    According to The Korea Herald:”The Taliban will set free all 19 South Koreans taken hostage in Afghanistan since ……

  2. The return of the prodigal son…

    Kim Jong-iL’s son Jong-nam has returned to Pyongyang. Is there enough room for two fat men in the ROK?…

  3. Fly me to Manila…

    Hawaiian Airlines wants to begin flights from Honolulu to the Philippines. What is good luck in Hawaiian?…

  4. WaPo, Other MSM Won’t Run ‘Opus’ Cartoon Mocking Radical Islam…

    More censorship of cartoons by the MSM because it might offend radical Islamists.
    From Foxnews
    The Washington Post and several other newspapers around the country did not run Sunday’s installment of Berkeley Breathed’s “Opus,” i…

  5. [...] Bullwinkle Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, Pursuing Holiness, Faultline USA, Right Celebrity, Allie Is Wired, third world county, Wake Up America, The Crazy [...]

  6. The Clinton China Connection – Paw Family Donates…

    William Paw, the 64-year-old head of the household, is a mail carrier with the U.S. Postal Service who earns about $49,000 a year,…

  7. Right Truth says:

    Ahmadinejad is right, so what will the US do?…

    A power vacuum is imminent in Iraq and Iran is ready to help fill the gap, says Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. No kidding. Isn’t this what he has been working toward for the past year, by sending in his military,…

  8. Finding a New World Order of Peaceful Coexistence:…

    President of the Islamic Republic of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the leader of that bastion of humane treatment told a press conference recently:&l ……

  9. Round-up of Michael Yon’s articles…

    For those of you who do not who Michael Yon is, he is a citizen journalist who has been in Iraq and Afghanistan for most of the war with the only support coming from you and me. He is giving us the news that most ‘journalists’ are afraid to go fo ……

  10. I got my results…

    Of last week’s surgery. A nurse from the doctor’s office called around lunch-time. There was cancer in the lymph node….

  11. [...] Thoughts, Big Dog’s Weblog, Right Truth, DragonLady’s World, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, Right Celebrity, third world county, Wake Up America, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, [...]

  12. The AFLAC Scam…

    While the three younger ones, all appearing sweet and innocent, divert their “mark” (or intended target) with a show of friendliness , the fourth — the eldest — sneaks in from behind the person’s back to expertly rifle through his or her pockets a…

  13. Diversity is strength for new Iraqi Army; OTB…

    展e池e here fighting a war, and when we go on patrol, it痴 one fight. There have never been any sectarian issues, said Hesser. 迭eally, it痴 almost like another Marine unit taking over, but it痴 not about 閃arines and 選raqis, it痴 about good …

  14. PETA Smacked For Smacking Vick…

    Don’t think that this is saying what Vick did is in any part OK. He did horrible things, he is a horrible person, and he should spend some good time in jail. At least 2-3. It is amazing to me, as a sidebar, that he could get anywhere from a year …

  15. Prime Minister John Howard’s GutS…

    People are scared of Muzlims. #%$$ing Scared.

    ……

  16. [...] Views, Webloggin, The Bullwinkle Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Conservative Thoughts, Faultline USA, Right Celebrity, third world county, Allie Is Wired, Blue [...]

  17. CAIR: Media Cowers in Face of Islamist Threat…

    An Anti-CAIR Blogburst. On August 24th, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), issued a “News Release” trumpeting the role CAIR played in getting the Christian TV program “Live Prayer with Bill Keller” off the air in Tampa, Florida. …

  18. A New Journalistic Low From Time Magazine…

    I’ve seen cheap shots before — but exploiting this tragedy in this manner is inexcusable. Bush Motorcade Kills Cop What — did the George W. Bush order his motorcade to speed up and run this law enforcement officer off the……

  19. [...] & Views, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Conservative Thoughts, third world county, Allie Is Wired, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Blue [...]

  20. TUES, AUG 28 Just When You Think It’s Safe to Go Into the Water…….

    TUESDAY, AUGUST 28  The Florida Masochist is now dealing with every melanoma survivor’s worst nightmare.  After 12 years being ……

  21. The Clinton Campaign offers us a lesson on how to launder campaign donations…

    Is this coincidence or is this a scheme to ‘launder’ campaign donations?  I believe it is a carefully arranged way to direct money to campaigns, bypassing campaign donation limits, and not a coincidence.  And likely, perfectly legal, i…

  22. MSNBC and CNBC: No pro war ads allowed…

    Via Powerline:

    MSNBC, CNBC Refuse to Run Pro-War Ads

    We wrote here about the television commercials that Freedom’s Watch has produced, featuring veterans and their families, that urge Congress and the public to continue supporting t…

  23. The Mathematics of Being Soft on Crime…

    The government of the Netherlands is starting a $38 million government program to combat extremism. Extremism in this case is defined as either right-wing nationalism and Islamic fundamentalism. The new program is designed to combat the root causes of …

  24. Breaking news: Top Clinton donor wanted on swindling charges…

    His name should be familiar.  I just blogged about his nifty donation laundereing scheme.

    Is this coincidence or is this a scheme to ‘launder’ campaign donations?  I believe it is a carefully arranged way to direct money to c…

  25. The Knucklehead of the Day award…

    Today’s winner is Lauren Caitlin Upton….

  26. Illegal Aliens Flee Arizona Ahead of New Enforcement Law…

    Which clearly proves that enforcement works! Even the thought of impending enforcement works. It isn’t rocket science for goodness sake and we can only hope – and demand – that our elected officials take note and have the will and the courage t…

  27. Right Voices says:

    “If the Iranian missiles strike Israel, by Allah, I will go to Trafalgar Square and dance with delight.”…

    If things don’t work out, I bet this guy could get a job at CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, CNBS, MSNBC, NYT’s, WaPo, Boston Globe, LA Times, or USA Today
    Trackposted to Right Pundits, Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Rep…

  28. Right Voices says:

    “If the Iranian missiles strike Israel, by Allah, I will go to Trafalgar Square and dance with delight.”…

    If things don’t work out, I bet this guy could get a job at CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, CNBS, MSNBC, NYT’s, WaPo, Boston Globe, LA Times, or USA Today
    Trackposted to Right Pundits, Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Virtuous Rep…

  29. John Edwards and MY SUV…

    ……

  30. Battlefields: the Good and the True—Part I…

    (I have been posting infrequently during the past few weeks because of family needs that had to be met. I’ll be posting more regularly now.) We are bombarded from every side with warnings and even threats about Global Warming. I’ll……

  31. SaY no to HumoR if ure Muss-lim, that is….

    Ha. Pick a State..any A-rab State.
    No matter how deep you dig, there ain’t no pony in either pile.

    ……

  32. More Democratic campaign donation $candal$…

    So why so much focus just on Democratic scandals?  Because they annoy me pointing the finger at the corruption in the Republican party when their house is just as dirty.

    They claim to be the party of the working class and accuse the Repu…

  33. Clinton to ditch Hsu’s money…

    My initial reaction was to laugh.  Damage control.

    But a part of me has to wonder why.  Afterall, the money he raised was legal right?  So why act as though it was tainted?

    Clinton Donor Under a Cloud in Fraud Case

    Senator Hi…

  34. [...] Right Truth, Big Dog’s Weblog, The Pet Haven Blog, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, Right Celebrity, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Right Voices, [...]

  35. G.I. Joe..the remake! now: not American…

    Hmmmmmmmm. Notice the colors Paramount and Hasbro…um…I believe they are Red, White, and Blue. Look again wouldya.

    ……

  36. Decisions on Energy Usage…

    Thinking about unintended consequences yesterday in my post, reminded me about something I read in the early 90s. I think this article, Road to Nowhere, makes several crucial points about the unintended consequences of ignoring information that is alre…

  37. Finger pointing and excuses begin in the VA tech probe…

    Let the excuses begin.  The School and the Government are going to vigorously defend themselves and blame the other.  I am going to deconstruct this dreck in detail.  At the bottom, I will note the real solution which the panel…

  38. [...] Originally Posted by HAZENDRO Please explain to me how i sounded like a racist in the above post? because im critizing the way this case is being handled? When Mychael bell was attacked with beer bottles by a group of white THUGS, was that not Racist?n Was that not attempt murder? Answer that He was not attacked by beer bottles. I do not know where you are getting your information but it is disturbing that you cannot get the facts straight. He is the one who had a criminal record. Not the victim. Look for yourself. * The Jena 6: Mychal Bell’s Criminal History*-*Pursuing Holiness [...]

  39. [...] glad that Bell is being charged as a juvenile. I’m aware of his criminal record, having posted on it as soon as I learned about it, but I still believe we as a society are far too quick to treat juveniles as adults. If we need to [...]